mxlegend99
Referee
- Messages
- 23,080
Probably not. But he wont have to.Will Fifita have to turn up more than once a month at the Panthers or Roosters?
Probably not. But he wont have to.Will Fifita have to turn up more than once a month at the Panthers or Roosters?
Will Fifita have to turn up more than once a month at the Panthers or Roosters?
Use the money wisely this time - might I suggest a half back......Good riddance. He only plays on the offensive side of the ball anyway. Time to rebalance our cap and stop spending $1 million plus each on forwards.
Hopefully Laffrancchi gets sacked though for these comical mid season clauses.
He won’t come to Penrith, it’s a ploy for more money or he’ll end up at the roosters
(edit well played skeep can’t believe the green horns fell for your trap)
Only morons say this.when you hear how the cap is supposed to distribute talent across the clubs
I would agree with this. It’s there to stop clubs going broke trying to compete with the big 3 (Broncos, Roosters and Storm). See without it these three clubs between them would have contested in all 27 grand finals in the nrl era.Only morons say this.
If we choose to believe morons, that’s our own fault.
We got him through his peak 1 game form period, not going back there fortunatelyTPJ is still out in the ether if Penrith want to over pay for a big useless spud
Yes I'm a nincompoop to some degree. Would not having a salary cap change the top 4, which seem pretty consistent in the NRL era?It still very much applies
Without a salary cap it would be a free for all, and clubs like the roosters and broncos would be able to pay substantially more. Payroll would be pushed beyond the nrl’s grant and teams would go broke trying to keep up with the Jones’s
the existence of a salary cap is what prevents wages scaling out of control and allows the nrl to manage payroll costs at a level that is sustainable for the entire league
Probably a good move for all parties. Fifita is a downhill skier which a top team can afford to carry but under delivers for a bottom team.
That said, it’s always laughable when you hear how the cap is supposed to distribute talent across the clubs yet apparent marquee players go from bottom teams to top teams.
It still very much applies
Without a salary cap it would be a free for all, and clubs like the roosters and broncos would be able to pay substantially more. Payroll would be pushed beyond the nrl’s grant and teams would go broke trying to keep up with the Jones’s
the existence of a salary cap is what prevents wages scaling out of control and allows the nrl to manage payroll costs at a level that is sustainable for the entire league
Not having a salary cap would essentially turn the game into an ESL situation where short of some Liecester mircale, only 3-5 clubs a year would go into the season thinking they are a real chance at a premiership because of talent disparityYes I'm a nincompoop to some degree. Would not having a salary cap change the top 4, which seem pretty consistent in the NRL era?
Sure but that is a p*** poor outcome in reality. I’d rather any club die (that’s including mine) than have no chance of success.
In essence if the ARLC actually care about the quality of the competition (btw even more so considering they are wanting to expand) they probably try and think of something better than a salary cap - I did hear V’Landys talk about it but if he gets a draft through or any other better system than that would be a great accomplishment