What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumoured and Confirmed signings - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blues Riff

Bench
Messages
3,352
Im still stuck on the why we want Ivan as opposed to the how and when we get him.
I'm not convinced that we do want him. There's been nothing official since Gus mentioned the original conversation between Ivan and O'niell. The media attention that this would bring was no doubt the trigger for Hook's demise, but the whole conspiracy doesn't ring true with me. I don't think Gus is the Autocrat he's been made out to be and I believe his power is diminishing at the club. It's an unpopular opinion, but I'd go as far as saying that Gus has been truthful for the most part and that his involvement has been minimal.
I think the club's faith in Ciraldo is genuine, not to say that Ivan won't join the club at some stage. When Ivan was still with us, there was talk of him eventually replacing Gould, so maybe that's how it pans out down the track.
 

billypilgrimnz

First Grade
Messages
5,173
Im still stuck on the why we want Ivan as opposed to the how and when we get him.

Well, this is the key question. Obviously it is to keep Nathan, but we really have to question whether he is worth the fuss. And I'm 99% sure Gould would rather not have Cleary snr. back.
 

mxlegend99

Referee
Messages
23,647
It is their choice. We don't have to pay because we outsmarted them, paying someone when you don't have to or giving away more players would be stupid.
Exactly.

Every club was lining up to sign Bathan a year in advance because they were legally allowed to. Why should signing a coach legally be any different?

Its up to the club to decide if they want to keep someone committed elsewhere. Like we did with Peachey. Dragons did with Merrin etc. Tigers need to decide that with Ivan.
 

Bob

Juniors
Messages
1,501
Well, this is the key question. Obviously it is to keep Nathan, but we really have to question whether he is worth the fuss. And I'm 99% sure Gould would rather not have Cleary snr. back.
Only 99%, me I’m 100% he doesn’t want Ivan back
 

martielang

Bench
Messages
3,585
It is their choice. We don't have to pay because we outsmarted them, paying someone when you don't have to or giving away more players would be stupid.

Have we outsmarted them though? Gus wants his man for next year, the Tigers know this. They have just as much power as us, hence why I think we’ll compensate them, they’ll release him & everyone will live happily ever after.
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
Have we outsmarted them though? Gus wants his man for next year, the Tigers know this. They have just as much power as us, hence why I think we’ll compensate them, they’ll release him & everyone will live happily ever after.

I think this qould be right if we didn't have Ciraldo. The club seems to have a lot of faith in him if need be.
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
Everyone crows about the salary cap making a close comp yet the top 4/prelim games are all prem winners from the last 5 years and Storm will be playing 3 GFs in a row and going dor back to back. The salary cap really isn't helping.
 

billypilgrimnz

First Grade
Messages
5,173
Everyone crows about the salary cap making a close comp yet the top 4/prelim games are all prem winners from the last 5 years and Storm will be playing 3 GFs in a row and going dor back to back. The salary cap really isn't helping.

Sounds like sour grapes to me. Maybe they have coaches and players who know what they are doing?
 

OldPanther

Coach
Messages
13,404
Sounds like sour grapes to me. Maybe they have coaches and players who know what they are doing?

Yep that's it. Or it could be the people who run the game banging on about how great the salary cap works when we've got the same results happening over and over at the top. If that's the game then so be it but don't lie about it as a marketing gimmick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top