Finals poll

[Gary Gutful]

Bangwest

Thats quite clever.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Hey @Hindmarshisgod2, f**k off!

 

[emjaycee]

Is home final weeks 1 & 3 no longer achievable?

Only if we finish in the top 2.
Otherwise away final week 1 and then home final week 2 (if we lose week 1) or week 3 if we win in week 1.
Highest place team in each game gets the home final.

EDIT: above assumes a top 4 finish.
If we finish 5 or 6 we get a home final in week 1, but will play the loser of 1v4 or 2v3 in week 2 and because they finish higher we play at their home in week 2. In week 3, we would play the winner of 1v4 or 2v3 at their home.

 

[84 Baby]

Only if we finish in the top 2.
Otherwise away final week 1 and then home final week 2 (if we lose week 1) or week 3 if we win in week 1.
Highest place team in each game gets the home final.

EDIT: above assumes a top 4 finish.
If we finish 5 or 6 we get a home final in week 1, but will play the loser of 1v4 or 2v3 in week 2 and because they finish higher we play at their home in week 2. In week 3, we would play the winner of 1v4 or 2v3 at their home.

Yeah yeah I know. Just wanted to know if a second place finish was still achievable

 

[84 Baby]

Thats quite clever.

But is it cleverer than WangBest?

 

[84 Baby]

No no BangWest better

 

[emjaycee]

Yeah yeah I know. Just wanted to know if a second place finish was still achievable

Yep, as long as Roosters lose their remaining games and we win all of ours and Raiders only win one more.
So, mathematically it is possible.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Yep, as long as Roosters lose their remaining games and we win all of ours and Raiders only win one more.
So, mathematically it is possible.

View attachment 32396

And the Chooks could even win one game provided we improve our F/A vs them by +60 per game on average.

 

[emjaycee]

And the Chooks could even win one game provided we improve our F/A vs them by +60 per game on average.

Dont be ridiculous.
It was a serious question FFS.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Yep, as long as Roosters lose their remaining games and we win all of ours and Raiders only win one more.
So, mathematically it is possible.

View attachment 32396

Good to see that you have upgraded from your shitty, colour coded spreadsheet.

 

[84 Baby]

Yep, as long as Roosters lose their remaining games and we win all of ours and Raiders only win one more.
So, mathematically it is possible.

View attachment 32396

Well then the BankWest double gets my vote

 

[hindy111]

Thats quite clever.

First it was a spelling error. Then I started to sing pet shop boys Go west but replaced the words with bangwest.
It's very fun.

 

[Gronk]

Foxsports lab has us finishing 4th



PREDICTED FINAL LADDER

1 STORM

2 ROOSTERS

3 RAIDERS

4 EELS

5 SEA EAGLES

6 RABBITOHS

7 BRONCOS

8 SHARKS

9 PANTHERS

10 KNIGHTS

11 WARRIORS

12 TIGERS

13 DRAGONS

14 BULLDOGS

15 COWBOYS

16 TITANS

PREDICTED FINALS SERIES

First qualifying final: STORM (1) v EELS (4)

First elimination final: SEA EAGLES (5) v (8) SHARKS

Second qualifying final: ROOSTERS (2) v (3) STORM

Second elimination final: RABBITOHS (6) v (7) BRONCOS

Every team’s run home is analysed below. They are listed in their current ladder order.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nr...n/news-story/85237c7c912423c6763a5264ca2885b2

 

[84 Baby]

Nine would love a Souffs/Boncos final

 

[Hindmarshisgod2]

Anyone want to re evaluate?

Lol to the morons who actually think we could be top 4.....

Clueless

 

[Western_Eel]

i think with Brown and Sivo suspended we probably won't win another game

 

[Kornstar]

i think with Brown and Sivo suspended we probably won't win another game

Maybe in my blind rage last night i missed it but why is Sivo out?

 

[Western_Eel]

Maybe in my blind rage last night i missed it but why is Sivo out?

I'm just assuming the match review committee is going to get him. they don't like hard tackles

 

[Kornstar]

I'm just assuming the match review committee is going to get him. they don't like hard tackles

If they charge him for that i will never watch another game ever again, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the tackle, the guy was still holding the ball.

 

[Gronk]

Anyone want to re evaluate?

Lol to the morons who actually think we could be top 4.....

Clueless

If the best negative you can come up with is that we are not worthy of top 4, then you need to try harder.



Even the Parramatta Cave merkin would not really believe that we are a chance to challenge. The concept of the top 4 finish was only ever entertained because we have a soft run home and the teams around us play each other. Still might happen. Wouldn't that burn ?