herbert henry1908
Referee
- Messages
- 21,880
No I wouldn't, and I'd be daft if I did. But... there is a big difference between signing an established FB, who has succeeded in that position, to pushing an elite centre into the role simply because you don't think the current FB is as good. Like I've said, if we signed Mitchell as a FB where does our strike power come from in the other outside back positions? We could have a world class FB, and still lose. We NEED balance, this is what I'm trying to say. I'd take Mitchell at centre in a heartbeat, even though I think signing him is a risk, it's a risk we should probably take... IMO obviously.
As I said, worst case is you move him to centre if your balance idea proves correct.
Our centres hardly get any ball as is, Mitchell at fullback would get ball.