Generalzod
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,148
Dank was at Manly aswell what do you think happened there snartarse....lol, you really think they just randomly picked an NRl club and a third of the squad and said; "you'll do"?
Dank was at Manly aswell what do you think happened there snartarse....lol, you really think they just randomly picked an NRl club and a third of the squad and said; "you'll do"?
Yep, well the club was either negligent or incompetent is just as bad.
They may well have been that, but it isn’t as bad. Negligence is treated differently under the law to an act with intent.
It’s also difficult to make a moral argument that negligence is as bad as someone doing something with intent.
They employed Dank, for what purpose I wonder?
You forgot Premiership winner and Australian Test player.
You wonder- exactly.
That would be the same Dank that was employed by a number of other professional sports organisations prior. I wonder why they employed him?
We know Sharks are sht at hiding stuff, doesnt mean that their wasnt a club funded illegal drug program at Cronulla because he had worked elsewhere lol
Doesn't mean there was either.
And we were initially talking about whether it was endorsed by the club- nice move of the goal posts.
Management failings was what they got busted for. Anything further is just your speculation.
yep and his brother is also serving a banWho remembers Gallen when he was an 80kgs wringing wet back rower at Wenty???
I do, so does Brian Smith. He had some very interesting things to say about him.
If you're paying for something then I don't think endorsed is a stretch. Ignorance is not a defence lol
If you engage me to do (X ) but I do (Y), does that mean that you endorsed me to do it?
Ignorance is a partial defence, and it was accepted as a partial defence. The club were punished for management failings and the players were punished for unknowingly and unwittingly taking the substances. So you're wrong. As f**king usual.
So they got injections, lozenges and creams from him and never knew anything was wrong? Hmmm. Dont they go through extensive drug education programs about their responsibilities as a professional sportsman to know what they are putting in their bodies?
So when Dank said he left a record with Elkin of everything players where being given that doesnt count as the club knowing what was going on? When your club Dr raised his concerns with the head coach and was ignored that didnt count that the club knew what was going on? When yous ay the club didnt know. which part of the club exactly are you talking about?
Anyway I'm sure you'll deny it all and say it was all Dank and Sharks were innocent lol.
Like spud said, someone who isnt a doctor tries to give you an injection then you ask wtf is it. It was systematic drug cheating Gallens attitude on it is pathetic. He was the captain and he is in the biggest denial out of everyone who was involved.
Pointing the finger at Manly doesnt do anything to exonerate the sharks.
Manly had enough money and the right people in the right positions to manage Dank. Cronulla were povo and shouldnt have engaged someone who runs on the edge but couldn't be properly monitored.Dank was at Manly aswell what do you think happened there snartarse....
I watched the '95 match recently on Kayo where Chief knocked himself out trying to put a hit on Spud. Was always a good contest but Chief hardly owned Spud.Chief owns spud.
Better money elsewhere.
Qlders will pay.
Chief owned Spudd, most definitely. Every time they had a blue, Chief would've been the points winner if it was a boxing match. '97 Grand Final Chief smashed Spudd a couple of times, forced a few errors from him. Only time Spudd came out on top was that incident in '95 when Chief knocked himself out (even then Spudd carried on like a complete twat, standing over an unconscious Chief mouthing off: to the point where Cement Gillespie basically yelled at him to stop being a goose).I watched the '95 match recently on Kayo where Chief knocked himself out trying to put a hit on Spud. Was always a good contest but Chief hardly owned Spud.
Spudd couldn't hang with a AFL player and gassed himself out with his awful gorilla short arm Boxing style...was quite the embarrassment.Chief owned Spudd, most definitely. Every time they had a blue, Chief would've been the points winner if it was a boxing match. '97 Grand Final Chief smashed Spudd a couple of times, forced a few errors from him. Only time Spudd came out on top was that incident in '95 when Chief knocked himself out (even then Spudd carried on like a complete twat, standing over an unconscious Chief mouthing off: to the point where Cement Gillespie basically yelled at him to stop being a goose).
Spudd would've loved to have gotten one-up on Chief but like in the cartoons he was always just that one step behind lol.