hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 148,888
Tell that to Tommy Turbo.It's a team game.
Tell that to Tommy Turbo.It's a team game.
You mean the bloke with a worse win rate than both Gutherson and Brad Arthur's?Tell that to Tommy Turbo.
And Whats Manly’s win rate without him???You mean the bloke with a worse win rate than both Gutherson and Brad Arthur's?
It's a team game.
The team needs his attack and he needs the other middle defenders to cover for him in defence. How is that so hard to understand? Junior Paulo is my favourite player you f**ken nitwit. Don't pretend I'm trying to blame him for the loss. I use him as an example of how even our 'best' players have weaknesses.except for Jnr Paulo
The team needs his attack and he needs the other middle defenders to cover for him in defence. How is that so hard to understand? Junior Paulo is my favourite player you f**ken nitwit.
Don't pretend I'm trying to blame him for our problems.
Pointing out his shortfalls isn't blaming him for the loss. I'm not calling for him or anyone else to get dropped. That's the difference.You already did, he was your scapegoat for the other forwards being too gassed to defend out wide
cant take it back merkin
Pointing out his shortfalls isn't blaming him for the loss.
Pointing out his shortfalls isn't blaming him for the loss. I'm not calling for him or anyone else to get dropped. That's the difference.
really,
or maybe I was just being argumentive
you know what that's like, right ?
you already did
Pretty sure I said it's a team game. I'm not one to look for scapegoats.
Tackle efficiency hides the situation where players only attempt high percentage tackles. Like when Niukore played centre this year.If you’re going to pinpoint a particular player in a particular position for a team, can you at least make sure, that particular player is the weakest amongst his teammates. Looking at the tackling stats, Paulo’s stats (tackle efficiency) read better than both RCG and Nrown.
I don't see why we would play a different structure while Paulo is off the field. As for our results during that time, if you thought about it before asking dumb questions you might realise there are plenty of other changes that occur while Paulo is off the field, including other players that we are likely to be missing at the same time (RCG, Nrown) as well as some of the opposition's starting middles or even their dummy half having a rest.And if any of us are really going to take your theory seriously about compressing so much to allow for Paulo, do we compress less when Paulo is off the field? Or does waqa defend better with Paulo off the field
If you're going to troll don't admit to it ffs. Nitwit.is this your googly or leggie ?
But you are just happy to scapegoat the whole team, FFS!!Pretty sure I said it's a team game. I'm not one to look for scapegoats.
It's not about whether their coaching decisions are right or wrong, it's about probability and risk. Every decision they make could go either way. It's about getting more successes than failures over a given timeline. If something goes wrong it's not that the coach didn't know it could go wrong. The alternative decisions also could've failed, maybe worse. And after the fact smartarse fans with no skin in the game pretend they know better.I also think it's silly to suggest NRL coaches are far better tactics amd knowledge wise then some of us guys. I reckon plenty of coaches have different ideas of what works and many do not see faults in their own coaching styles. We all will see the game differently.