Round 24 - Roosters vs Rabbitohs: Friday 27th August 7:55pm @Suncorp Stadium

[Jim Rockford]

@Valheru hasnt been back because he can’t meet the argument Jim. Credibility shot over this issue, but I don’t actually mind him.

Just should think a bit before the rudeness sometimes.

I just noticed your sig phantom. Very cool!

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

I just noticed your sig phantom. Very cool!

I am going to try to get paws up too once I figure it out!

 

[Jim Rockford]

I am going to try to get paws up too once I figure it out!

Paws Punisher perhaps?

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

Lats has just cut his losses and taken the six weeks.

After Annesley he had no real option but a big legal fight.

I think the club has erred and he should have fought it.

But done is done.

 

[Valheru]

Well @Valheru was just dismissing the argument in a discourteous way.

As you understood, I haven't made any remark on the incident as I haven’t had the opportunity to hear both sides.

But already Annesley has condemned the process to a farce. The judiciary should take this account and let him off or give him a week.

You can’t have police officers breaking someone’s leg while issuing a fine for jaywalking. That’s an extreme example, but you get my point.

He isn't going to the judiciary mate because he knows he is guilty.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

He isn't going to the judiciary mate because he knows he is guilty.

My point was about Annesley, stop deflecting mate.

 

[Stubby]

We are all devastated but have to move let’s give the kid from the entrance a chance he might just be the next Clive Churchill

 

[Jim Rockford]

He isn't going to the judiciary mate because he knows he is guilty.

Noone is disputing that. It would be to challenge the severity of the grading which is too harsh.The fact an injury happened is supposed to have absolutely no bearing on the charge.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

Lats has just cut his losses and taken the six weeks.

After Annesley he had no real option but a big legal fight.

I think the club has erred and he should have fought it.

But done is done.

And I will add, he got the “Renno treatment”

I suppose they weren’t prepared to risk the resources necessary.

I would have sat him down and asked for 50/50 legals to fight it as that seems fair.

But don’t bother going to the judiciary from here on.

Just consult with the tin hat wearing Robbo first.

Get him to fight your case in a press conference.

That’s the take away.

Another nail in the coffin for the nrl while they chug beers with Senior Police and politicians.

 

[Valheru]

Noone is disputing that. It would be to challenge the severity of the grading which is too harsh.The fact an injury happened is supposed to have absolutely no bearing on the charge.

It was worse than CHN which got a grade 3.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

It was worse than CHN which got a grade 3.

Where’s your Annesley come back chuckles?

 

[Valheru]

Where’s your Annesley come back chuckles?

What is your obsession with Annesley? He comments every week on incidents that happen on field. He said it should have been a send off and it should have. He never put an opinion forward on what punishment the MRC should impose.

 

[BotanyBorn&Bred]

We are all devastated but have to move let’s give the kid from the entrance a chance he might just be the next Clive Churchill

He's a LaPa boy, he's a cousin of my brother-in-law

 

[Jim Rockford]

It was worse than CHN which got a grade 3.

In your opinion. Besides it's the fact it was deemed Reckless and not Careless that is the point of contention here.

 

[southsport]

When will Robbo's penalty be announced?
.

 

[Valheru]

In your opinion. Besides it's the fact it was deemed Reckless and not Careless that is the point of contention here.

That point is not under contention anywhere outside of souths boards.

 

[Valheru]

When will Robbo's penalty be announced?
.

Monday... like all of them are.

Relax he will get his fine

 

[BotanyBorn&Bred]

When Greg Inglis smashed Dean Young, that was originally a reckless that was downgraded to careless, in those days. But as Callmack explained they don't do that anymore, the system changed in 2015.


Just my opinion, this was similar, maybe slightly worse than Latrell's because it's front on, the aim started high, and kept going up through the point of contact.

 

[Jim Rockford]

That point is not under contention anywhere outside of souths boards.

That you've seen. Look a little harder.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

What is your obsession with Annesley? He comments every week on incidents that happen on field. He said it should have been a send off and it should have. He never put an opinion forward on what punishment the MRC should impose.

You can’t be serious, can’t you read?

He made his opinion more than clear.

You think he was supporting Latrell? Ffs!

You’re coming down with Stryker disease.

I know Jim! Let’s ask the head of the NRL Robbo!