hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 65,923
Don't need policies until the week before the election. Attention span of the average voter. They've got more important things to do like "How do I pay for this week's groceries?"
You're in charge of promotions
Don't need policies until the week before the election. Attention span of the average voter. They've got more important things to do like "How do I pay for this week's groceries?"
Some counters:I've told this story before about unions.
When I was in the Anzac bridge project we needed to shut power off for a day which effected 60+ workers. We happily agreed to do it on the RDO. Being a contractor I didn't mind. They also offered us compensation to do it which wasn't really necessary but a nice gesture.
Then the union rep got wind. Made a few calls and it was cancelled.
Instead 60 guys basicaly sat in the lunch shed all day while 2 or 3 of us contractors did the shut down.
At a guess of approx $500 per workers that's 30k of taxpayers money.(government job)
Could of donated that to a charity or homeless person.
How about we nationalise mining and tie immigration to mining. You can only come in after 2 yrs in the mines.Perhaps we should all get together and form our own party.
We'd need to start writing some policies
"Cheaper electricity"Perhaps we should all get together and form our own party.
We'd need to start writing some policies
Well it’s obvious @JokerEel that dear Gronkys ideas of what is left wing is conflated and confused.
He could really dine out on Marx. Would be totally life changing and he could find his inner @Gronk.
They didn’t have wokeys back in his day and my guess is that Marx would treat them all with the privileged lentil loving contempt they deserve.
He certainly was.Yeah, his definitions seem a bit all over the place. Marx probably wouldn't have much patience for the modern 'wokeys'...he was more about material conditions than Twitter discourse.
He certainly was.
He should publish his philosophical manuscript.
I was listening to a critique of the US tariffs today.
The argument was that Trump should carve out and reduce tariffs for goods bought from overseas that are needed for American companies buying this stuff who are competing with overseas
If these US export companies are forced to buy more expensive US sourced goods, they won’t be able to compete with companies based overseas who are buying their stuff from the source, cheaper than the American exporters can.
So you have a well intended Tariff for the short term, but down the line you might be sacrificing more US jobs than you are saving.
But I guess that doesn’t apply to domestic sales in the US market.
The Toyota company, their US made cars never meet the standard of the Japanese made cars. A source of frustration as they’ve worked so hard on it.
I think US made products are ok, but I rarely need to use them ( that i know about). Their cars look like garbage, but probably better than the Europeans.
Yeah, that’s the classic tariff paradox protecting domestic industries short term but potentially making them in competitive long term. The input costs argument makes sense, especially for exporters.
And agreed on Toyota..Japanese made ones seem to have that extra edge. US cars might not be pretty, but at least they’re not as finicky as some European ones.
Is Trump smiling or squeezing a nugget? It's hard to tell.
No we can’t.
You dont rate Big Mike's chances at the next election
Don’t care, union is union comrade.
I’m pretty neutral.
It’s a spoof.how will they police this ? any ideas ?
