What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

RustedonEel

Juniors
Messages
770
We will eventually go the same way.

Big difference between us and the UK is that they started running out of cheap supplies of coal and had resorted to imports for a period.

Yes - they have been better at setting energy policy and phasing out coal than Aus, but context is important.
And they are increasing their nuclear power generation. Something our Luddites cannot understand.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,559
I think it's foolish to compare Australia and the UK, as it would Namibia and Sweden.

The UK have their own issues. The doesn't shine and their transition to clean energy has been f**ked over by Putin, the guy with the gas. It says as much in their press release.


With the cost of energy paramount, why would you ignore a cheaper, cleaner alternative ?


As this lady explains, nuclear fits some countries. She is not against nuclear. It's just a dumb idea for Australia right now. I never say never either. Maybe (after they are invented and) when you can buy a SMR like you can a Boeing A380 and they are safe, Australia will be able to use them to compliment their energy mix, but let's stop with the unnecessary bruhaha. The Australian people have sent a pretty clear message on Saturday.

 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,559
And they are increasing their nuclear power generation. Something our Luddites cannot understand.
Interesting. Who are the luddites in this country?

Blaming Spider-Man GIF
 

Delboy

First Grade
Messages
8,156
Easiest solution, retro fit at govt expense HELE to current coal powered while the move to renewables is considered and maintain power supply and base load. Without massive subsidies and new poles and wires which will cost possibly more than nuclear , we need to return to reliable and cheaper power.Gas of course into the supply and now we hopefully get the zealots Bowen and Bandt moved on, there is a chance to see sense and reflect on what is needed.

Can’t stand back and watch us continue to increase prices etc while the rest of the world has a better strategy compared to our contribution of 1.4 %, of global greenhouse , looking good and patting yourself on the back to virtue signal doesn’t help the economic outlook.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
79,559
Easiest solution, retro fit at govt expense HELE to current coal powered while the move to renewables is considered and maintain power supply and base load. Without massive subsidies and new poles and wires which will cost possibly more than nuclear , we need to return to reliable and cheaper power.Gas of course into the supply and now we hopefully get the zealots Bowen and Bandt moved on, there is a chance to see sense and reflect on what is needed.

Can’t stand back and watch us continue to increase prices etc while the rest of the world has a better strategy compared to our contribution of 1.4 %, of global greenhouse , looking good and patting yourself on the back to virtue signal doesn’t help the economic outlook.

Whilst you are "considering the move" the country has already moved.

We will be 82% renewables by 2030.


The last coal power station in Australia will be closed in 2038.



This is the state of power generation right now.

1746671166246.png
 
Messages
13,616
Whilst you are "considering the move" the country has already moved.

We will be 82% renewables by 2030.


The last coal power station in Australia will be closed in 2038.



This is the state of power generation right now.

View attachment 101870
All very awesome!

Glad the government is using the mandate to drag the dinosaurs into the future.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
155,077
I cant see us being 100% renewable at any stage, unless we invest heavily in power storage and to do that we will need to greatly improve our infrastructure to get power to the storage facility.
 
Messages
17,081
Easiest solution, retro fit at govt expense HELE to current coal powered while the move to renewables is considered and maintain power supply and base load. Without massive subsidies and new poles and wires which will cost possibly more than nuclear , we need to return to reliable and cheaper power.Gas of course into the supply and now we hopefully get the zealots Bowen and Bandt moved on, there is a chance to see sense and reflect on what is needed.

Can’t stand back and watch us continue to increase prices etc while the rest of the world has a better strategy compared to our contribution of 1.4 %, of global greenhouse , looking good and patting yourself on the back to virtue signal doesn’t help the economic outlook.
40% of Australia's power supply is currently renewable.

The current government has approved more power projects over the last 3 years that any the previous government did in their 9 years.

In 2020 the "Gas powered recovery" was announced. When it was, gas was a $4.20 a Kg on election days 2022 gas was $34.75 a Kg. Gas is what is keeping energy prices high, as power companies charge the highest prices for the power they get from all different power sources.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top