We would've been 16-8 down in that last five minutes. That's deflating.What do we think about our preset determination to take 2 points when it's on offer? I mean, our defence is better than our attack and I like that we back it, but we lost by 2 tries to 1 tonight and we had 2 opportunities to attack the line and didn't take them.
May have won 18-16We would've been 16-8 down in that last five minutes. That's deflating.
May have won 18-16.
I hate it. Particularly in a situation like tonight where we took it after several sets hammering their line.What do we think about our preset determination to take 2 points when it's on offer? I mean, our defence is better than our attack and I like that we back it, but we lost by 2 tries to 1 tonight and we had 2 opportunities to attack the line and didn't take them.
Do we always take the two on dry decks?
A spot-on reality check.Normally I'm not a big fan of taking the 2, but with this team and our halves it's probably the reason we'll win games.
Today we took the 2, but we also had 4-5 shots straight at them and blew them all.
Metcalf hasn't quite developed as a close-range playmaker, CHT has little other than short bombs that hope for the best. Unless it's Metcalf, we don't have the speed for long range tries. If teams shut down our barge-over tries, we don't really have anything. We don't run good lines or engineer backline sweeps, ironically the stuff TMM was doing for fun.
I don’t think they were terrible but they were both off their best. I thought Ali was a touch rusty too.I thought the biggest DMs were Leka and Laban. It seemed to me like Leka was having a shocker so they took him off, but then Laban was even worse so they had to get Leka back on.
I agree 100% with this. We have to take 2 points, because our attack isn't good enough.Normally I'm not a big fan of taking the 2, but with this team and our halves it's probably the reason we'll win games.
Today we took the 2, but we also had 4-5 shots straight at them and blew them all.
Metcalf hasn't quite developed as a close-range playmaker, CHT has little other than short bombs that hope for the best. Unless it's Metcalf, we don't have the speed for long range tries. If teams shut down our barge-over tries, we don't really have anything. We don't run good lines or engineer backline sweeps, ironically the stuff TMM was doing for fun.
I wouldn't give Ford 3 (I think I gave him 2) but I agree. His work rate is absolutely mammoth, it allows us to do what we're doing on both sides of the ball. He's right up there in the NRL for average post contact metres per run, but gets no love because he used to be a guy who dropped the ball 3-4 times a game and gave away penalties.3. Ford - Now he pads stats? The guy played 57 minutes, outran and tackled just about everyone, with plenty of post contact metres, was (unusually) mistake free & awake to situations. Handing no points is kinda insane.
2. Clark - Hardly any hyperbole's left to say, the usual business and this time with an angry green pack at him
1. CNK - shame about the bin, he was fired up tonight
Can't fault effort all around, nobody phoned it in.
DM to Pompey for that completely brain dead penalty.
DWZ defended fine, but couldn't do anything on attack.
And yes I still stand by a TMM/Metcalf combo - CHT has too much Leuluai in him, a handy player at best with good shoulders.
And was Pompey's effort really braindead? Metcalf f**ked around so much, that Pompey's timing got completely off kilter.