What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Game Future NRL Stadiums part II

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
Any rebuilt Stadium Australia would have a capacity of 80 to 90k. The capacity will never be reduced. Sydney and Australia needs a large scale rectangular stadium. Anything under 80k is too small.

There is also absolutely NO NEED for a roof to ever be built on a stadium in Australia.It is such a waste of money and defeats the purpose of playing an outdoor sport.
The only exception would be Canberra.
Wasn't the scrapped plan (due to COVID) for Accor Stadium going to lower the capacity to 70k?

Accor Stadium Redevelopment
 

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
Not if the lower two bowls are full and designed well

Accor is ok when 40k are in and that’s with an awful design for league games

Previous stadium proposals have talked about club mode

Dogs look like that’s their long term stadium. Even a 40k stadium as proposed in Liverpool could be too small for them long term.
Once again, where are you finding the funding for this? The NSW government aren't the Saudis lol.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183
Once again, where are you finding the funding for this? The NSW government aren't the Saudis lol.
State budget that is over a hundred billion each year

It’s literally a drop in the ocean of what they spend a year

MCG is asking for 2 billion and the Victorian govt is broke

A new accor will cost a minimum of 2 billion. Something good maybe double

Wa built a 3 billion stadium with a smaller economy

Victoria park is estimated to cost up to 5 billion.
 

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
State budget that is hundreds of billions each year

It’s literally a drop in the ocean of what they spend a year

MCG is asking for 2 billion and the Victorian govt is broke

A new accor will cost a minimum of 2 billion. Something good maybe double
Brisbane Olympic Stadium will cost around 4 billion for 63k seats. Now add another 37k seats what do you think the budget will be lol. There is no logical reason for the NSW government to invest in a 100k stadium.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183
Brisbane Olympic Stadium will cost around 4 billion for 63k seats. Now add another 37k seats what do you think the budget will be lol.
Lot of that is infrastructure which Homebush already has

Do you have any idea how much the nsw govt has been spending on new metro and other public transport links like roads ?

Stadium Australia cost 1.3 billion almost 30 years ago
 

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
Lot of that is infrastructure which Homebush already has

Do you have any idea how much the nsw govt has been spending on new metro and other public transport links like roads ?
A metro and roads are more important to the city than a 100k stadium.

Why do we need a 100k stadium?
Stadium Australia cost 1.3 billion almost 30 years ago
And building costs have gone up quite a lot since then.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183
A metro and roads are more important to the city than a 100k stadium.

Why do we need a 100k stadium?

And building costs have gone up quite a lot since then.
They are running the metro to go right past Accor stadium for a reason

Sydney’s population has grown by 1.4 million since stadium Australia was built

In another 20 years probably another 2 million people will be in Sydney
 

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
They are running the metro to go right past Accor stadium for a reason

Sydney’s population has grown by 1.4 million since stadium Australia was built

In another 20 years probably another 2 million people will be in Sydney
I think your obsession with beating the AFL is blinding you here.

For Rugby League, we don't need a huge ass 100k stadium. We need a stadium with amazing sightlines, an awesome atmosphere and a venue where fans want to show up every week. Basically a bigger Suncorp for Sydney. For the NSW government, they want value for money. What we don't need is another white elephant.

Anything between 60-80k can probably accomplish that. A few people on here want 80k and that's fine, but I want the overall experience to come first before how many people it can fit. And don't underestimate building costs.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183

This photo shows why stadium Australia was always going to be a dud for league games

And it opened at 110k which they retained for four years.
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
7,950
I think your obsession with beating the AFL is blinding you here.

For Rugby League, we don't need a huge ass 100k stadium. We need a stadium with amazing sightlines, an awesome atmosphere and a venue where fans want to show up every week. Basically a bigger Suncorp for Sydney. For the NSW government, they want value for money. What we don't need is another white elephant.

Anything between 60-80k can probably accomplish that. A few people on here want 80k and that's fine, but I want the overall experience to come first before how many people it can fit. And don't underestimate building costs.
It's not so much beating AFL because Accor will and should never be a 100k stadium. But ai think 80k is minimum. Why? Sydney is Australia's biggest city and in a few different ways this will be Australia's national stadium for rectangular sports.

I completely agree atmosphere, experience, sightlines ect need to be top notch, but the stadium needs to be a statement piece also, the ground that dominates all other rectangular venues for capacity and therefore is befitting of Sydney and befitting of being a national stadium.
 

newc18

Juniors
Messages
544
It's not so much beating AFL because Accor will and should never be a 100k stadium. But ai think 80k is minimum. Why? Sydney is Australia's biggest city and in a few different ways this will be Australia's national stadium for rectangular sports.

I completely agree atmosphere, experience, sightlines ect need to be top notch, but the stadium needs to be a statement piece also, the ground that dominates all other rectangular venues for capacity and therefore is befitting of Sydney and befitting of being a national stadium.
Something like a Metlife Stadium with a roof would be pretty sweet. Would be very costly though.
 

Steel Saints

Juniors
Messages
1,372
Once again, there comes a point where it's financially just not worth adding more seats. There were talks about the Brisbane Olympic Stadium being around 80k capacity but they decided on 63k due to costs. You don't just keep adding seats and use population growth as an excuse.

The NSW government doesn't have a limitless budget. They will want value for money in any project they build. My point is I want to see the spectator experience to come first over how many seats it can hold. 10 times out of 10 I would pick a SI-FI or an Allegiant over a Wembley or MCG.

With Accor, from my point of view, I am not after extra seats. Just for the capacity to stay as it is. The shape of the stadium turning it into a rectangle is the priority. Of course the biggest challenge is funding, otherwise Accor would have been done already!

I hope that once the tv deal is done, the NRL and other rectangular codes could begin having discussions with NSW govt about possible future redevelopment of Accor. Or maybe after the 2027 RWC. Start the conversation and from there, let's see what transpires.

Accor doesn't need to be built tomorrow, but it is 26 years old and may require years of planning to fund and redevelop it.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183
With Accor, from my point of view, I am not after extra seats. Just for the capacity to stay as it is. The shape of the stadium turning it into a rectangle is the priority. Of course the biggest challenge is funding, otherwise Accor would have been done already!

I hope that once the tv deal is done, the NRL and other rectangular codes could begin having discussions with NSW govt about possible future redevelopment of Accor. Or maybe after the 2027 RWC. Start the conversation and from there, let's see what transpires.

Accor doesn't need to be built tomorrow, but it is 26 years old and may require years of planning to fund and redevelop it.
Accor isn’t a stadium priority for the nrl

Canberra is the most urgent

Followed by Newcastle brookvale suncorp and gong

Manly get sellouts just about every week
 

Steel Saints

Juniors
Messages
1,372
Accor isn’t a stadium priority for the nrl

Canberra is the most urgent

Followed by Newcastle brookvale suncorp and gong

Manly get sellouts just about every week

I did say discussions could be held after the RWC and Accor doesn't need to be done tomorrow . Yes, Canberra is the most urgent, but i am not sure if Brookie would get any funding from state government.
 

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,983
Accor isn’t a stadium priority for the nrl

Canberra is the most urgent

Followed by Newcastle brookvale suncorp and gong

Manly get sellouts just about every week

All of the above should be priorities for the NRL. One of their biggest clubs plays at Accor plus multiple marquee NRL events every year, getting it rebuilt in to a rectangular stadium with modern facilities should absolutely be a goal.

Canberra, Brisbane, Newcastle, Mt Smart etc can all be pushed for as well at the same time.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
45,183
All of the above should be priorities for the NRL. One of their biggest clubs plays at Accor plus multiple marquee NRL events every year, getting it rebuilt in to a rectangular stadium with modern facilities should absolutely be a goal.

Canberra, Brisbane, Newcastle, Mt Smart etc can all be pushed for as well at the same time.
Given the nsw govt are such tightasses on spending on rugby league stadia and the arl seem overwhelmed with managing expansion and the tv deals think it’s about picking your battles

Given the cost of a new stadium at Homebush all the other nsw stadia should be prioritised first

You could do Newcastle to 40k, Brookie to 30k and gong to 30k for under a billion and get a lot of benefit for league

Even if they built a new accor today I would argue the game gets little actual benefit as marquee games sell out regardless

If they do spend 3 billion or so on a new Accor there won’t be any other stadium upgrades for ages

Raiders need a 30k roofed stadium and the arl need to prioritise lobbying for this

Lobbying for league stadiums the commission is clueless
 
Messages
17,363
Considering the "schools not stadiums" catchcry when the ALP was in Opposition which they used against Allianz's re-design (and before that the now aborted refurb of Accor), I wouldn't hold out much hope of any significant money on stadiums spent in Sydney during the next 2-4 years somehow.

Many of the NSW ALP parliamentarians who pushed that line in public are now Ministers.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top