When a club like the Bradford Bulls is admitted to Super League with an embarrassement of a ground and an undersize pitch who finished 3rd in a 2nd tier competition Super League has problems.Superleague will be dead in two years
Fails to keep the interest alive for mid table clubs. You can’t cut out 9 clubs of 14 from end of season interest!Should be top 5, with 6th and 7th playing midweek for the last spot.
1 and 2 go through to week 2
3 plays the winner of 6 and 7
And 4 plays 5
Not unusual for nrl teams to be in the 8 on 12 or 13 wins of 24 games. Some people just like a whinge.
If they get back up to 10k crowds and competing for trophies you’re going to look a bit silly lolWhen a club like the Bradford Bulls is admitted to Super League with an embarrassement of a ground and an undersize pitch who finished 3rd in a 2nd tier competition Super League has problems.
If they get back up to 10k crowds and competing for trophies you’re going to look a bit silly lol
stadium aside they are the club with best potential to do that outside SL.
I seriously doubt if they will get that as an average, as a lot of fans of other clubs will boycott Odsal due to the state of the terraces.If they get back up to 10k crowds and competing for trophies you’re going to look a bit silly lol
stadium aside they are the club with best potential to do that outside SL.
Not unusual for nrl teams to be in the 8 on 12 or 13 wins of 24 games. Some people just like a whinge.
In my model 6 and 7 are still in playFails to keep the interest alive for mid table clubs. You can’t cut out 9 clubs of 14 from end of season interest!
nrl has has top 8 from 16 then 17 clubs for years and no one complains. SL has had top 6 from 12, basically same.
Going top 7 from 14 would make most sense, giving the number 1 team the first week off also brings more value to the lls.
Totally agree. That is the most logical play off number and way of running it.I think a Top 7 system with the League Leaders shield getting a first round bye like the NFL in their conference playoffs would be perfect and really give a point of difference to winning the LLS.
It also feels like an 'authentic award' for the team finishing first in a competition with no loop fixtures plus gives more prestige to the LLS.
So 8 of those 10 years is what I said lol. You spent a long time agreeing with me there!Oh Perth, you silly, silly sausage.
The last 10 NRL 8th place sides (wins/losses);
Roosters - 13/11
Knights - 12/12
Raiders - 13/11
Raiders - 14/10
Titans - 10/14
Sharks - 10/10 *Covid year*
Broncos - 11/12
Warriors - 15/9
Cowboys - 13/11
Titans - 11/12
So, let’s look at the evidence here Perthy. In a total of 10 completed seasons, only THREE sides have a record of getting in the play-offs with a negative record. It is in fact, unusual for sides to get in the eight with a negative record.
So 8 of those 10 years is what I said lol. You spent a long time agreeing with me there!
It's dumb but it's not the end of the world. NRL ran top 8 from 14 and 15 for years and the sky didn't fall.
Ditching the IMG criteria and going back to P&R would be far more catastrophic
I think in Super League the early finals games have been pretty poor crowd showings historically tbh. But if nothing else it keeps a few more eyes clinging on in hope of a miracle. I'm definitely in favour of retaining top 6 for competitive reasons but it won't actually damage the sport in any real way.And it's extra funds for the games, and generally play off games gets people off the coach to support there clubs. I don't see a big problem with it. It's what the game needs, and as long as the top 4 get a bonus for being there, it can only help the game.
I think in Super League the early finals games have been pretty poor crowd showings historically tbh. But if nothing else it keeps a few more eyes clinging on in hope of a miracle. I'm definitely in favour of retaining top 6 for competitive reasons but it won't actually damage the sport in any real way.
