What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Zac Lomax

Legal Eel

Juniors
Messages
1,667
This is an outstanding result.


A few thoughts:

1) They have conceded the restraint is reasonable and now further endorsed it;

2) Agreeing to pay our costs is a capitulation - not a settlement;

3) Parramatta now control his rights outright - come and get it! If we can't get a player for him this year or next year then he is worthless to us as a trading chip in 2028 anyway.

4) The NRL must have had something very big to hide!
 

85 Baby

Bench
Messages
2,884
So we still lost 150k after doing absolutely nothing wrong and all it cost the Storm was a little money. I’m proud of the club for standing their ground but as usual the Scum get off lightly.
When I say we, I mean us here. I think the club potentially also came away with a bit of inside knowledge. Whether that’s worth it, who the f**k knows
 

Timana

Juniors
Messages
1,649
Why does the Storm have to pay Parra's legal cost? Wasn't the suit against Lomax??

Unless Lomax has to pay Parra's legal costs and Melbourne said they will pay Lomax's costs so Melbourne have to pay both Parra's and Lomax's legal costs.
 

Timana

Juniors
Messages
1,649
Probably Melbourne realising their dirty laundry was about to be aired and then trying to figure out how to settle without it coming out
And the NRLs... would've been good to have had PVL and Abdo sweat... I guess they knew that this will settle and stayed in Vegas
 
Top