Eelementary
Post Whore
- Messages
- 58,889
Dont disagree. The Russell penalty was also ridiculous.
I think you guys deserved the win, all thoughts aside - but the way it was won (not your fault) leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
This ref was pathetic.
Dont disagree. The Russell penalty was also ridiculous.
Actually the way it was won (in GP) was the least of the problems. Walker was >5m offside and Madden missed the FG because of the Walker pressure. Its a clear penalty and really had to be given (Tigers lost a GP game the same way), but there were obviously a lot of other decisions that were rubbish or contentious (both ways IMO).I think you guys deserved the win, all thoughts aside - but the way it was won (not your fault) leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
This ref was pathetic.
I actually don't even think Simmonson scores at least one of those tries if he was still on the field.Actually the way it was won (in GP) was the least of the problems. Walker was >5m offside and Madden missed the FG because of the Walker pressure. Its a clear penalty and really had to be given (Tigers lost a GP game the same way), but there were obviously a lot of other decisions that were rubbish or contentious (both ways IMO).
For mine, its not just that the ref was pathetic, I actually think its more like it is the NRL approach. A lot of the decisions that appear ridiculous are actually completely consistent with the current NRL application of the rules. Unfortunately.
Im genuinely not rubbing it in your guys faces. It was a very tough loss to cop (Ive been there many times) and Parra were very toughand brave under the cicumstances.
FWIW, IMO if the Simmonson injury doesnt happen Tigers win by 13+, but it did happen.
Actually the way it was won (in GP) was the least of the problems. Walker was >5m offside and Madden missed the FG because of the Walker pressure. Its a clear penalty and really had to be given (Tigers lost a GP game the same way), but there were obviously a lot of other decisions that were rubbish or contentious (both ways IMO).
For mine, its not just that the ref was pathetic, I actually think its more like it is the NRL approach. A lot of the decisions that appear ridiculous are actually completely consistent with the current NRL application of the rules. Unfortunately.
Im genuinely not rubbing it in your guys faces. It was a very tough loss to cop (Ive been there many times) and Parra were very toughand brave under the cicumstances.
FWIW, IMO if the Simmonson injury doesnt happen Tigers win by 13+, but it did happen.
I was at the game, up the other end of the field, so I saw it on the big screen.Have you ever watched a game? Seriously?
I was looking at the point of contact.he never touched his head or neck and he came down behind him holding him.
It looked like a neck injury to you at first? His foot pointing at his arse didn't distract you?
For sure.He clearly talked him in mid air, its clearly a penalty. I could understand the argument that if he isnt tackling him, holding him, he doesnt land like that and the injury doesnt happen. A horrible accident.
He’ll fit right in then.He missed a very easy kick last weekend in CUP that would have won them the game...
Was pretty harsh I think but if you are going to make the point that the Moses penalty prior was "technically" a penalty because of contact with the head, the second one is the same. For mine, neither should have been a penalty.The golden point penalty was fine - the penalty which ties the game up was a stitch up.
And who are they going to convince to come, we already have money….piss O’Neill off should be absolute prorityEels boss Jim Sarantinos accelerates push for salary cap relief from NRL over foul play injuries
Three high-profile Eels players will combine for 49 games spent out injured as a result of foul play, while the culprits will miss just six. It’s set to spark talks with NRL over salary cap dispensation.
Parramatta chief executive Jim Sarantinos is set to accelerate talks with the NRL over salary cap dispensation for players sidelined by foul play after the devastating loss of Bailey Simonsson on Easter Monday.
Sarantinos confirmed he planned to open formal discussions with head office over the concept given winger’s absence comes hot on the heels of injuries to J’maine Hopgood and Isaiah Iongi.
The Eels now have three high-profile players sidelined for extended periods as a direct result of foul play.
“We haven’t had that direct conversation with the NRL yet but I will be,” Sarantinos said.
“We have had a stack of injuries and some of them have been accidents. But the reality is we have lost J’maine Hopgood, Bailey Simonsson and Isaiah Iongi – we have players who are going to miss 49 games through acts of foul play.
“The opposition are going to lose players for six games suspension in total. It’s one thing to lose a player where there’s no foul play involved.
“It’s another thing for J’maine Hopgood to do his ACL when he cops a hip drop. We can’t replace those players unless we promote development players or train-and-trial players.
“If we had salary cap and roster spot dispensation it would give us the scope to explore other opportunities. It’s something I think the NRL needs to look at and we will be talking to them about it.”
Simonsson is expected to be sidelined for an extended period after dislocating his ankle when he was tackled in mid-air by Tigers winger Luke Laulilii at CommBank Stadium on Sunday.
Hopgood and Iongi were already on the sidelines amid a frustrating injury list for coach Jason Ryles.
Immediately after his side’s golden point loss to the Tigers, Ryles said the idea of cap dispensation was worth discussing.
“Surely I think it’d be something worth considering,” Ryles said.
“Foul play, season-ending injury, there should possibly be something. I think common sense would prevail.
“I’m not sure exactly how that works. I asked our GM last week and he’s going to follow that up. That’s above my pay grade.
“The players don’t actually mean to do it. We understand that, but there’s a reason those actions are outlawed, because of what we’re going through now.”
Both penalties except Tuivati was called for our one when it was actually TDS, and fact is ref didn’t even see the one on Moses. Certainly throws up the possibility of what else he didn’t seeWas pretty harsh I think but if you are going to make the point that the Moses penalty prior was "technically" a penalty because of contact with the head, the second one is the same. For mine, neither should have been a penalty.
Don’t worry, Phones ringing off the hook!And who are they going to convince to come, we already have money….piss O’Neill off should be absolute prority
So why was it a penalty and he was put on report. If the result was the other way around, with the Tigpies player the one knocked out, he would've been sin binned for sure.For a head clash? No chance.
Yep. Happy for us to have big membership and good crowds, but on field success? No chance - a GF appearance every 10 years or so but when we are no chance of actually saluting.The NRL would never help us
Yep. Dunno about Manu but in hindsight we should have told Lomax he can only go once we have a suitable replacement. Or any replacement.Do we think we could have handled the Lomax situation differently in hindsight?
Joey Manu is bound to come back and most likely to play fullback with the injuries we have he would be a great replacement now..
We could have traded lomax to the storm for the NRL helping us get Manu to the club for this year atleast..
Was pretty harsh I think but if you are going to make the point that the Moses penalty prior was "technically" a penalty because of contact with the head, the second one is the same. For mine, neither should have been a penalty.
