blacktip-reefy
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,076
love to hang with you kiki. bun bun bun.!!!
Are you still going? :lol:
A comment re Johns and Gallens of context
See above explanation.
Did you? Your contributions were clearly as memorable to me as our contributions to this thread will be when I wake tomorrow...
lol
dont forget the joooooooooooooossssssss
you tinfoil hat nutbag
speaking of rediculous analogies skeepe gay jokes are now equivalent to murdering gays?
See, you're trying to rationalise but it's not that simple. A lot of it is to do with the history of the discrimination.
When have blondes ever been killed just for being blonde?
When have blondes been excommunicated from their church just for being blonde?
When have blondes ever been sacked from their jobs just for being blonde?
When have blondes ever been rejected by their families and society in general just for being blonde?
When you can answer those questions, then perhaps your comparison might hold some water. Until then it's an absolutely ridiculous analogy.
love to hang with you kiki. bun bun bun.!!!
So you're also against paying out on blondes, irish, kiwi sheep farmers, etc....??
What about the baby jokes from years ago... while I found them extremely sick should a class action have been taken up representing all babies..??
Ever listened to Bill Crosby or Eddie Murphy..?? All whites should sue the pants off them going by your arguments...
Someone is always the brunt of a joke... if you don't find it funny don't laugh..
*banjo's play softly*
Hang on, so are the gays behind the new world order now? Last nutbag told me it was Princes Chalres!
Skeepe, if I've interprested him correctly is making two point about the level of harm that various 'jokes/comments' are able to inflict and the varying level of sensitivity due to past occurrences.
As the groups he mentioned have suffered significantly as a result of discrimination against the skin colour etc, he is arguing that the potential harm is greater for them, as would be the level of sensitivity, again if I have got it right.
another genius! you Radonikis and blacktip can all hang in the cave together.
No, but the dramatic rise in the homosexuality and the feminisation of not just men, but various animal species, has been scientifically linked to air pollution, addatives and poisonous chemicals in our foods etc.
There's various massive markets that would make a major loss in profit if the government and media actually put out the truth.
That truth being homosexuality is a genetic flaw. And the rise in homosexuality and feminisation of men can be factually linked with the forementioned industries.
There is no New World Order. Just governments and media protecting their own interests and painting homosexuality for something that it isn't.
If you say so, arbitor of all context and meaning...sure am
you still lying?
And you've talked about him for several pages... established anything? Or just been channelling one of your favourite posters, becoming a version of Mong?yes you bought up johns
we have established that a few times
It's called passing the time MN... it's too wet to play outside.oh the ones you have written a couple of dozen paragraphs trying to defend your obvious lies
So that you can fail to understand it again? Nah, it's OK. I'll just refer you to the earlier answers, again...tell us again bart how non consensual doesnt mean non consensual
Oh yes MN, I'm "squirming" here, squirming in your dreams, squirming just the way you like it, squirming oh so very long and hard... :lol:be sure and use laughy emoticons - they may hide your squirming
No, but the dramatic rise in the homosexuality and the feminisation of not just men, but various animal species, has been scientifically linked to air pollution, addatives and poisonous chemicals in our foods etc.
There's various massive markets that would make a major loss in profit if the government and media actually put out the truth.
That truth being homosexuality is a genetic flaw. And the rise in homosexuality and feminisation of men can be factually linked with the forementioned industries.
There is no New World Order. Just governments and media protecting their own interests and painting homosexuality for something that it isn't
are you in a government hospital or a private one?
i would hate to think my taxes are paying for your internet access
It has? Ok... How do we even know there has been an increaee of significance? I mean how long have they had a queer census anyway?
It's called Science.
http://socioecohistory.wordpress.co...g-chemicals-turning-man-and-animals-feminine/
Yea, well I guess we will have to take your word for that, as you have provided no evidence or valid reasons why that would be so. I would be inclined to think that the markets will make sh*t loads of money no matter what the government says, but what would I know right?
What do you mean take my word for it. You aren't seriously suggesting these industries would profit if the truth was out in the mainstream and their activities and industries were properly regulated for maximum safety... Are you?
Clearly you don't know much. Profit, profit, profit my man. These people are greedy greedy men.
Yea.. I wasn't even aware consensus existed that the cause of homosexuality was genetic let alone the impact of industry.
LMAO. You aren't aware of much, are you? How's life living under a stone?
f**ken Rudd maken me a androtop!
Of course they are and so are you, you just don't realise it.