Hey warriors, as someone who holds some pretty strange views myself (i get into arguments with my wife that polygamy should be legal) i understand what its like to be ridiculed for your views, but i should make a couple of suggestions...
Firstly rethink your "homosexuality is a disability" idea, because its ludicrous. Not being able to procreate because your gay is no more a disability that not being able to procreate because you dont like stinky nappies. The word disability has several overt connotations, which make it inappropriate to use in this case. They arent physically or mentally disabled, they are procreationally challenged, which is not a disability, indeed for many its a choice.
Secondly, rethink your tone, dont misrepresent an argument and describe it as common sense, and dont characterize your opinion or far out ideas as fact, or merely a hard to swallow truth...this "everyone agrees with me by common consensus that its a disability" is not only condesending but flat wrong. Only a very small minority (and usually those of an intolerant point of view) would ever classify it as a disability. Saying "people reject it, no matter how truthful" implies that something is true, when it is in fact the most far out opinion of your own, one without evidence and that runs contrary to the vast majority of peoples ideas about the world.
Thirdly, if you are going to espouse an opinion which links pollution to homosexuality then you actually better come up with some, any sort of evidence, and not one that comes from a white power website. Homosexuality occurs in nature, and has been documented back through human history to early historic times. There was institutionalized homosexuality in both greek and roman cultures, and they didnt have to deal with air pollution from plastics manufacture or fertilizers running off into rivers. Its not a hard to swallow truth, its just a dumb idea without any basis of evidence. At best, its your opinion, and in MY opinion, not even within the bounds of possibility.
Which follows onto my fourth suggestion, people have a tendency to find patterns that fit what they believe, and this has a tendency to follow their predjudices. Someone who is a racist will happily believe and propogate an idea that aboriginals are genetically predeposed to violence or low intelligence, without any evidence that that is the case, or perhaps they will collect the scant evidence, ignoring and dismissing the strong evidence that contradicts their preconceptions. This is why this is idea is a racist idea, because you really have to have racist preconceptions to even give it creedence.
Now, you say you arent a homophobe, and fair enough, but unfortunately some of your ideas and they way they are described are homophobic.
Classifying it as a disability (which it isnt) which like a disease increases in likelihood with higher pollution (which it doesent), and suggesting people need to "shake the dust from their eyelids" to see the "truth" (which is in fact nothing more than baseless opinion) is homophobic rhetoric, my friend.
So my fourth suggestion is, be aware that its not JUST the way you put things, some of your actual ideas seem to require homophobic preconceptions to genuinely consider.
Anyway, i hope this helps and your not too offended, i did try to attack the ideas not the idealist.
