What amazes me is some people go on like I am a crap fan because I suggest we might lose more than win, but when you look at it, maybe some fans are viewing things out of red and blue blinkers?
Most here seem resigned to the Sea Eagles game being a loss, so I am hardly out on a limb there.
The Melbourne Storm game , even at EAS, is a game where we will be underdogs. We recently lost to them, and they still beat us even though we were the better team on the night - and that comes down to the Storm having the class advantage over us, which will only be more emphasised if we play them without Mullen.
The Eels recently gave us a shock playing at EAS, and add in Feleti Mateo and it being away from home, and its certainly no easy game and one that can genuinely go either way.
The Cowboys are responsible for our worse loss of the year, so assuming we beat them just because it is at EAS is a bit presumptuous , though it is a game we SHOULD win.
The Raiders in Canberra is a tough game for EVERY team no matter of ladder position, so we definitely can't assume that is a win for us either.
I mean, when you look at it, I'm just being as unbiased as I can when I look at the games, and there's some pretty glaring evidence there that none of the games should be treated as ' wins ' more than a ' loss 'simply because these teams have beaten us already in 2009, and away from home games are never easy in the NRL - especially in Canberra.
I truly do believe that Panthers game might be make or break.
Look at our halves. Everyone is going on about how crap Rogers is, so what makes you guys think he is all of a sudden some consistent saviour that can be depended on?
Remember the last time Dureau/Rogers played together against Souths ( and we will be a very similar line up for the next few weeks ). And this is assuming we don't have any other injuries in the interim!!
