Canard
Immortal
- Messages
- 36,964
Who is the worst player on $350K or more to ever grace a football paddock?
For mine its Carl Webb by a country mile, you could count the number of good games he has played in 3 seasons of his latest contract on one badly deformed hand.
As bad as his was in 2008/2009, he has reserved some special sh*t for 2010, after getting belted by a guy who works a deep fat frier at Smorgies in another Mundine circus bout, he seems to have actually gotten worse as Rugby League player.
He can always be relied on for a game-changing mistake or penalty, and then will "make up" for it with 6 runs and 12 tackles with his fitness close to Rugby Union standards.
If he was on NRL minimum he would be grossly overpaid, but for someone on $350K+ I rate him as all time worst.
For mine its Carl Webb by a country mile, you could count the number of good games he has played in 3 seasons of his latest contract on one badly deformed hand.
As bad as his was in 2008/2009, he has reserved some special sh*t for 2010, after getting belted by a guy who works a deep fat frier at Smorgies in another Mundine circus bout, he seems to have actually gotten worse as Rugby League player.
He can always be relied on for a game-changing mistake or penalty, and then will "make up" for it with 6 runs and 12 tackles with his fitness close to Rugby Union standards.
If he was on NRL minimum he would be grossly overpaid, but for someone on $350K+ I rate him as all time worst.
