What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Loyalty in sport: Who was worse?

Who was worse?


  • Total voters
    109
  • Poll closed .

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
The situations are not even compareable. FFS Luke Lewis did worse than Inglis. I don't like Inglis much, but unfortunately for him other factors out of his power have come into contention which obviously affected his intentions.
 

bronco_buddy

Juniors
Messages
120
The situations are not even compareable. FFS Luke Lewis did worse than Inglis. I don't like Inglis much, but unfortunately for him other factors out of his power have come into contention which obviously affected his intentions.


Must have missed that one, what did Luke Lewis do??
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
111,101
It's not always the players. Clubs are not always known for the loyalty.
 

Parra

Referee
Messages
24,900
I thought it was now a business.

Hang on, it could be a form of entertainment.

It's 2010 - it is now a media product.


What's this sport you are talking about?
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
Must have missed that one, what did Luke Lewis do??

In 2008, the first year after the anti tampering deadline was removed. Luke Lewis had agreed to terms with Souths, the signing was announced and all, however Penrith realised there was a loophole meaning that no formal contract could be registered with the NRL until July 1st without that current club's position. So they upped their offer and Lewis stayed, as did Nathan Smith who agreed to terms to rejoin the Raiders. It's still how the rules work, why clubs are reluctant to formalise signings before July even now.
 

Pierced Soul

First Grade
Messages
9,202
SBW was worst as he just took off without telling anyone..... common denominator between SBW and GI - mundine

Tallis was pretty bad as well. I can't even remember what his rational for sitting out the season was besides wanting to go to brisbane.

the luke lewis/nathan smith thing regarding the contracts was apparently made to give the current clubs a "final say" in retaining players. i think the clause is ridiculous...

by the way Greg redfern isnt in brisbane where you're fiance works
 

TheDalek079

Bench
Messages
4,432
the clubs that signed with super league. especially the ones the ARL were bringing into the comp which decided to go to SL before even playing a match
 

Liddell

Juniors
Messages
2,175
In 2008, the first year after the anti tampering deadline was removed. Luke Lewis had agreed to terms with Souths, the signing was announced and all, however Penrith realised there was a loophole meaning that no formal contract could be registered with the NRL until July 1st without that current club's position. So they upped their offer and Lewis stayed, as did Nathan Smith who agreed to terms to rejoin the Raiders. It's still how the rules work, why clubs are reluctant to formalise signings before July even now.

Pretty sure it wasnt that black and white. He agreed to terms with Souths while Penrith were going through a tough run. Penrith won a few games in a row when Lewis was moved to half, Souths had Wing on the sidelines and had a shocking start to the season, Penrith then matched or outdid Souths offer after initially not getting into a bidding war, and Lewis re-signed.

He said it was for his missus as her father was pretty sick at the time and didnt want to move too far away. Could have been true, but he must have got pretty sick in the few weeks in between.

Hope he's doing alright now.
 

kmav23

Juniors
Messages
2,014
This is a proffesional sport / business....

Only loyalty is to the $$$...

Clubs also show no loyalty.... works both ways....

some people are so naive....

People shake hands... on agreements everyday but circumstance change...

If Inglish blew out his knee.out for 2 yeas.. do you think they will still sign him ??????
 

kmav23

Juniors
Messages
2,014
Pretty sure it wasnt that black and white. He agreed to terms with Souths while Penrith were going through a tough run. Penrith won a few games in a row when Lewis was moved to half, Souths had Wing on the sidelines and had a shocking start to the season, Penrith then matched or outdid Souths offer after initially not getting into a bidding war, and Lewis re-signed.

He said it was for his missus as her father was pretty sick at the time and didnt want to move too far away. Could have been true, but he must have got pretty sick in the few weeks in between.

Hope he's doing alright now.


Redfern to penrith is about 1.5 hour drive... so its rubbish....
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
Inglis said he'd sign. Shook hands.

But then it rained.

SBW walked out on a deal he had signed.
He then stated that there was no loyalty in sport. He wore the consequences.


So who was worse in your eyes?




Note: Sailor, Rogers, Blacklock, Tuqiri, Tahu , cutie and Folau left for another code but all saw out their contracts so are not included in this.

It says in the paper today that Inglis actually signed a "letter of agreement" with the Broncos.

I still think SBW though by a long way.
 

Latest posts

Top