Mr Pmatta
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,574
x1I agree - the 3P apologists are out in force today.
How dare we question the re-signing of a rookie coach until 2059 midway through his first (and so far largely unsuccessful) season?
x1I agree - the 3P apologists are out in force today.
How dare we question the re-signing of a rookie coach until 2059 midway through his first (and so far largely unsuccessful) season?
Do we have any right to? Let's see....
* Tahu sooks off;
* Guru retires;
* Poore's been injured for an eternity;
* MK for a while suffered a long-term injury...
This isn't exactly the same squad as 2010. Tahu and Guru are MASSIVE losses in themselves. How can you reasonably expect a higher finish given the fact we have an obviously weaker squad?
Adam Dykes? Michael Vella in his latter years? Aaron Cannings? These are all blokes who didn't always give 100% on the field.
As for the Sandow comment, there were no "top line" halfbacks available in 2012. But I suppose that you would have rathered we kept Robson and McGuire/Mortimer/Humble as our halves for 2012, instead of signing a 22 year old halfback who could be anything?
We've gone over this 1000 times - and some people on here hate hearing it - but the board quite deliberately sabotaged DA from day one. They wanted him gone from day one. Unfortunately reaching a grand final forced them to put their plans on the back-burner.
SK, on the other hand, is their man and I can assure you he will not be held to the same 'standards' by the board as DA was.
Having said that, SK may well prove to be a good coach. Hopefully he does. He is only six months into his tenure so it's far too early to tell.
OK...so why extend his contract then? Anyone can promise the world and deliver a "plan" for the future. It's delivering on it that counts. All I am saying is that we do not (IMO) appear to have any improvement on last season and this article hints that we are ready to install this unproven coach rookie coach as the messiah!!
Once again, the 3P/Kearney apologists are out in force. Need I remind you that Daniel Anderson too inheritated a team he didn't choose - one, I might add the never even looked like making the 8 the year before he took over - but he banded them together to make the GF. Kearney may well go on to do the same thing, I hope he does. But at this point, he has achieved NOTHING. So why this talk about contract extensions??? It is lunacy. Surely, you can see this?
WOE
Death ride? Is that what you think? Or is it simply what you tell yourself in order to ignore the perfectly acceptable criticisms of 3P?
I am of the same opinion regarding Anderson. One day, the real facts may come out - with any luck. Until then, we have to suffer the spin that is 3P and get behind the current coach and team.
Go the Eels!
WOE
3P?? Oh you mean the blokes that have just been voted in, ffs! I couldn't a shit about who our directors are, I've always supported every decision the board at the time made and will continue to do so, not much has changed from this black duck in 35 years!
While we are struggling our defense have improved out of sight, our team looks organized and understand their role and there seems to be good team harmony and with most players playing their role. We don't have the squad to compete every week but Kearney has been good and has a long term plan.
I'm well aware of certain facts and the actions of some board members at times last year beggars belief. But that's not for me to comment on publicly.
I am of the same opinion regarding Anderson. One day, the real facts may come out - with any luck. Until then, we have to suffer the spin that is 3P and get behind the current coach and team.
Go the Eels!
WOE
His sacking follows an internal review conducted by CEO Paul Osborne and board members Geoff Gerard and Glenn Duncan, who is also chief executive of the club's major sponsor Pirtek.
the great wayne bennett and jack gibson couldn't get this squad we have to the top 4, take it easy on SK please. We have a squad that has about 10 players that wouldn't be playing NRL at any other club, SK has done well with what was left for him.
the great wayne bennett and jack gibson couldn't get this squad we have to the top 4, take it easy on SK please. We have a squad that has about 10 players that wouldn't be playing NRL at any other club, SK has done well with what was left for him.
the great wayne bennett and jack gibson couldn't get this squad we have to the top 4, take it easy on SK please. We have a squad that has about 10 players that wouldn't be playing NRL at any other club, SK has done well with what was left for him.
if what 3P put out about Anderson wasn't true after the review then why didn't he sue?
1 of the 3 who did the review wasn't a 3P man either http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...cy-board-meeting/story-e6frexnr-1225929647804
Anderson took a pretty average side to a Grand Final, started clearing out deadwood during a bad time in terms of player availability, and got the arse for failing to make the finals (supposedly)
Kearney has inherited a half built side, got it absolutely nowhere, but has managed to sign a few good players in a time where a lot more are on the market....so he deserves another 5 years? What a laugh...he has three years to prove himself, the smart thing to do would be to see how he goes over that time and then extend him if he does well. It smacks of hypocrisy to sign him on for longer when he has dine even less than Anderson did with the side, and really only has recruitment over him...even then we didn't see what Anderson would have done with quite a few actual good players on the market like there are this season. I'm not a conspiracy nut like some on here are....but this is not helping the idea that there was an agenda at work behind Andersons sacking...
We've gone over this 1000 times - and some people on here hate hearing it - but the board quite deliberately sabotaged DA from day one.