But is Burt good enough at fullback?? He did some good things but honestly you can't have a fullback that refuses to contest bombs. ATM Burt at 1 and Hayne is 6 is needed for this team but Hayne really should go back to the 1.
If they both train in their respective positions all off season and are prepared properly (which most people seem to think that Kearney and Arthur are quite capable, so there should be no arguments) and the addition of Sandow should be enough to make us look much better in attack.
I'd rather Roberts at 6 then Hayne as he is a much better ball player. Hayne seems to have one move which he uses over and over again plus his passing game is painfully slow and no where near crisp enough. Lets not forget Roberts won't be expected to carry the team but fill a role
Haynes biggest asset is his running game which is been vastly under utilized at 6
There is a reason Roberts has played a lot of NSW Cup, he offers very little. Hayne has been thrown into a position that he is unfamiliar with and has done a decent job, again IF his future is there, why aren't we doing it now?
DO we really need to get Sandow and Roberts to try and gel, fail and then move Hayne there again and then in 2013 we finally accept that he is a 5/8th???
Everyone seems to have such faith in Kearney but not when it comes to playing Hayne is the position that even he admits he will end up at........
I believe that Sandow and Hayne can be our long term halves combo and i believe Kearney can get the team to work around them, they both have the talent and just need to be steered in the right direction, i don't think Roberts has much hope.......
It will be much easier to slot a fullback like Barba or another proper support player in the team then changing your halves for the 100th time in 20 years!!!