What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How will the Roosters do in 2012

How will the roosters fo in 2012

  • 1st-4th

    Votes: 8 9.9%
  • 5th-8th

    Votes: 14 17.3%
  • 9th-12th

    Votes: 19 23.5%
  • 13th-16th

    Votes: 40 49.4%

  • Total voters
    81

DoggiesBro

Juniors
Messages
2,341
LOL both our props would start at your club hell most of our nsw cup would. why they didnt lose by 40 like manly
 

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
I'm a bit confused by all of the hooting and hollering over trial matches. Isn't a chance to test out combinations/new signings etc??

From memory, didn't the dogs have a few good trial wins last year. How'd that work out for them?

I'm a tigers fan, but certainly wouldn't be carrying on about their game against eels (well, maybe my blue and gold brother did cop some witty text messages)
We all agree, we are just giving it back to Doggiesbro after putting shit on Manly and talking up the Dogs over the trials.
 

Jud

Juniors
Messages
88
We all agree, we are just giving it back to Doggiesbro after putting shit on Manly and talking up the Dogs over the trials.

I don't know doggiesbro, although his posts are quite entertaining, but I think he just sounds like your average dogs supporter. "Halfwit" would be a compliment to most of them.
 

Jack_Napier

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
3,622
Lol the fact the loss came at the return to spiritual home belmore must kill him.

It's a trial, who cares. Even smithy said in the paper today most of the kids that played aren't really in mind for first grade selection. I'm just happy we came out of it without any injuries.

Oh and beating the mutts is a tiny bit of icing on the cake I suppose, specially at belmore!
 

firechild

First Grade
Messages
8,097
Oldfield, Whare, Lyon, Matai, Foran, DCE, King, Ballin, Kite, Galavaou, Burher, Lussick, G Stewart,

Starting

3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13.

WITH 3 MORE from the bench.

GEE how undermanned.

Sharks were missing their 2 best forwards too.:lol::lol::lol: 40 point loss.

1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.
 

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.
scaled.php


Shut it down, Doggiesbro gtfo you fool.
 

RWB

Bench
Messages
2,814
I was at the game you idiot, Barba, Tolman, Graham, Pritchard, Morris, Eastwood etc all played 20 minutes or under.

Roosters had about 20 players compared to the dogs with 30+ and the nsw cup grade played the ENTIRE first half, and half the second half.

We used 27 players across both halves, who you fooling you weren't there you thought we played our first team in the first half... citing 'reports' as your source :lol:

Just showing how full of shit you are, I'd hate to see how you take a loss in the season this result means nothing.
 

Parra Pride

Referee
Messages
20,784
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.

You do realise that the Dog's first grade players were only on the field for a combined 5 seconds while the Roosters had their entire first grade top 25 on the field at the same time?:crazy:
 

sputneek

Juniors
Messages
1,021
lol it's funny cause even dogs supporters admit their players looked unenthusiastic and lazy and Doggiesturd has to pull out every excuse in the book to justify the smashing :lol: He actually thinks Mortimer, J Carney, Kherillah, Tupou and Arona are our "first grade side".
 

DoggiesBro

Juniors
Messages
2,341
Your overhyped overpaid props got smashed by our bench reserve grade props :crazy:

You mean the 2 who played less then 20 minutes and both looked unreal while doing so?

Talking of smashed, how was romeleo on those feather props of yours.:lol::lol::lol: Hurt them so hard JWH had to elbow him to knock him out the dirty prick.
 

DoggiesBro

Juniors
Messages
2,341
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.

You do realise you had the bulk of your players including your "origin rep" hooker, and international halfs, along with your star studded centres and top props. :lol::lol::lol: And bench, and you got belted by close to 40 and thats by the sharks a club a bunch of you call spooners and comparer to lolsharks. :lol::lol: While they didnt have GALLEN OR JEREMY SMITH. The best forward in the game and another one who is as good as any manly forward missing.
 

DoggiesBro

Juniors
Messages
2,341
lol it's funny cause even dogs supporters admit their players looked unenthusiastic and lazy and Doggiesturd has to pull out every excuse in the book to justify the smashing He actually thinks Mortimer, J Carney, Kherillah, Tupou and Arona are our "first grade side".

I'd say Arona will be, possible Mortimer and J Carney too. Espeically now skd is in hospital.

Along with the likes of Moga, JWH, Mitchell, Masoe, Frank Paul, Aubbusson, Tasi and a few others who played a bulk of the game against players from our NSW cup and kids promoted. Finucane, Jackson, Browne and Taupau all killed it against your pack. Between them they would have 5-8 NRL games. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

Cockadoodledoo

First Grade
Messages
5,045
We used 27 players across both halves, who you fooling you weren't there you thought we played our first team in the first half... citing 'reports' as your source :lol:

Just showing how full of shit you are, I'd hate to see how you take a loss in the season this result means nothing.

I wasn't there either but when hearing our first tryscorer was the Winger Topou who scored after lead up work from Loxley and O'Sullivan in the backline. With the conversion taken by the 5/8 Kheralliah I was wondering if he even knows who are our first grade players.
 

Latest posts

Top