DoggiesBro
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,341
LOL both our props would start at your club hell most of our nsw cup would. why they didnt lose by 40 like manly
We all agree, we are just giving it back to Doggiesbro after putting shit on Manly and talking up the Dogs over the trials.I'm a bit confused by all of the hooting and hollering over trial matches. Isn't a chance to test out combinations/new signings etc??
From memory, didn't the dogs have a few good trial wins last year. How'd that work out for them?
I'm a tigers fan, but certainly wouldn't be carrying on about their game against eels (well, maybe my blue and gold brother did cop some witty text messages)
We all agree, we are just giving it back to Doggiesbro after putting shit on Manly and talking up the Dogs over the trials.
LOL both our props would start at your club hell most of our nsw cup would. why they didnt lose by 40 like manly
Oldfield, Whare, Lyon, Matai, Foran, DCE, King, Ballin, Kite, Galavaou, Burher, Lussick, G Stewart,
Starting
3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13.
WITH 3 MORE from the bench.
GEE how undermanned.
Sharks were missing their 2 best forwards too.:lol::lol::lol: 40 point loss.
LOL both our props would start at your club hell most of our nsw cup would. why they didnt lose by 40 like manly
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.
I was at the game you idiot, Barba, Tolman, Graham, Pritchard, Morris, Eastwood etc all played 20 minutes or under.
Roosters had about 20 players compared to the dogs with 30+ and the nsw cup grade played the ENTIRE first half, and half the second half.
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.
Your overhyped overpaid props got smashed by our bench reserve grade props :crazy:
you havent made a finals series in yrs HAHAHAHA GOLD, there your props u've had.
u need some serious time locked up
:crazy:
1. As I said, no Glenn Stewart.
2. You can't score 38 points (regardless of how many you concede) and win by 40. I thought they would have taught you that in Maths C?
3. Manly were missing their 3 best forwards (among others). You do realise that the 11-13 is Watmough, T-Rex and Stewart don't you?
4. It was a f*cking trial.
5. The dogs lost to a Roosters who you claim will be wooden spooners, if you want to take anything out of trial matches, start being concerned that the dogs couldn't beat the team you claim is the worst in the comp.
lol it's funny cause even dogs supporters admit their players looked unenthusiastic and lazy and Doggiesturd has to pull out every excuse in the book to justify the smashing He actually thinks Mortimer, J Carney, Kherillah, Tupou and Arona are our "first grade side".
We used 27 players across both halves, who you fooling you weren't there you thought we played our first team in the first half... citing 'reports' as your source :lol:
Just showing how full of shit you are, I'd hate to see how you take a loss in the season this result means nothing.