Son of Minto
Bench
- Messages
- 3,114
:lol: :lol:
He's easily better than both
Yeah, it showed it the WC Final. You "gronk merkin".
f**king Tardarm Turdwrist, tarding it up again
:lol: :lol:
He's easily better than both
When's the last time League signed a top Union player?
And none of this 'he played Union in high school' shit.
Garrick Morgan in the NRL I think. Gareth Thomas converted from union to league over in the UK a couple of years ago
I still cant get over the fact that they want Burgess as a centre. FFS the NRL has the likes of Inglis, Matai, Lyon, Hodges, Jennings, Hayne et all wearing club and rep Centre jerseys. How shit must a sport be if their World Cup centres included people like Burgess, Fui, Adam Blair, Matt Scott or George Rose?
The only way Union can sign big name League players is by guaranteeing them a test jumper in the world cup. Thats all they have. Remember when the Wallabies signed Sailor, Rogers and Tequiri - leaving ONE spot for every centre or winger playing Union in Australia? If thats good junior development............
Sam and George are both well below their market value at Souths. George especially could easily get better money elsewhere.
Lol @ comparing an inside centre in Union to a centre in League. They play completely differently.
Yes one touches the ball more than 2 times a game and makes more than 20 tackles a season, the other doesn't
maybe thats because it's odds on that they will fill to England bckline in the Yawnion world cup.Funny how no one mentions the Burgess brothers have taken below their market value to stay at Souths.
Maybe because Yawnion are going to pay big cash to plonk a League prop in the centres for a world cup! Thats like picking f*cking Matt Dunning and giving him Inglis test jumper.Honestly where did you pull names like George Rose, Matt Scott and Adam Blair from?
Only if they are the goal kicker :lol:An inside centre in union has more touches than a league centre as they play a lot tighter in
Nobody has any evidence that Sam and George are on "way less" than they could earn elsewhere, and in any event, the amount they can make as a group outside the game is far higher if they're all at the one club, where they can use the whole "family" image - that would be drastically watered down if they were to play against each other.
Without Sam, Luke and Tom wouldn't even be here, so if Sam's paid a bit less to enable Souths to pay his less talented brothers a decent wage, so what? Wouldn't most people in Sam's position do the same? Its not like he's on $50k instead of $500k.