Guys they are not interested in what we think is wrong with the game. How would we know, we are just the punters who support the game with our back pockets and our emotions.
Throw a survey out their ask a few questions that are safe and what ever answer you get is not a problem. Don’t give people the opportunity to explain their thoughts on why the game smells like two day old prawn shells.
In saying all that, if they get rid of golden point and cut out the wrestle it has achieved something. Anyway what ever the survey ends up telling the NRL they will have to run it past Uncle Nick and a few others for approval because ultimately they run the game
Yeah there’s a sense of arranged outcome because they chose all but one of the topics.
And I suppose they will rely on the survey to change the rules and then blame us if they don’t work out.
When I studied surveys and stats at uni, apart from confidentiality, a golden rule was to ensure that every question had an open box for comment at the end so the responder could add anything they wanted.
Then you had a better idea of their position and the info was much higher quality.
These survey monkey results can probably be contaminated anyway by multiple aliases and all that.
Its quite shoddy and cheap and then we don’t trust the nrl anyway because of past fibs and horrendous policies so such as “no fault stand down” which should be called “ guilt before innocence” a deprivation and stomping on human rights. Businessmen trying to be cops- f**k off.
Knee jerk reaction to the likes of barba, tarnishing and hurting all the players, who have the same (very small number of crims as the broader population) in the same age group.
ps: no question on the no fault fiasco