What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Too early for me to be relieved I guess, but I am a little bit... So what does that now mean?:shock:
  2. S

    Stewart banned till rnd 5

    As per the LeagueHq article ""The key line from Gallop after the ban and fine had been imposed was that Manly had "undertaken to review its ongoing stance in relation to Brett playing from round five on the basis of any new information that may come to light". In other words, the league expects...
  3. S

    Stewart banned till rnd 5

    Ok so Manly in initially taking a stance - that had been done by other clubs in the past upset Gallop and the NRL... They enforced their punishment ( I do get the reasons behind and the fact they are trying to clean the reputation of the game itself up - I can also relate to the outcry). They...
  4. S

    Stewart banned till rnd 5

    My comments were in regards to the suggestion that any player facing charges be stood down even before innocence or guilt was determined.
  5. S

    Stewart banned till rnd 5

    But that also shouldn't automatically scream "guilty" and thus immediate suspension.
  6. S

    Stewart banned till rnd 5

    General response only... I can understand the reasoning behind this but I don't know how fair the standing down of players before innocence or guilt is determined. The problem I have is if they are innocent how is that fair for them or their club. People have been falsely accused and charged...
  7. S

    Manly star accused of slapping sponsor and fined $10,000

    Ok quick question - despite Watmough coming forward (along with other witnesses) stating he didn't punch or slap the sponsor, why is there such a belief that he did? PS not condoning his comments (whatever they were - keeps getting worse with each media report) at all....
  8. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    okayfound the story regarding the webcam footage... Who uses a webcam to video outside?????? http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/sport/video-evidence-seized-in-stewart-case/2009/03/12/1236447343658.html
  9. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Did anyone see it before it got pulled down?
  10. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Yep don't try and help, video it with the hope it turns out to be something you can post on You tube....:crazy:
  11. S

    Some Sanity From The Usual Crap At The Telegraph

    Inclined to agree. Given he will be able to play after the 7 April hearing must just be a co-incidence no? Or will 4 weeks suspension become the norm, depending of course on media build up. What will the league do if a new sexual assault claim is brought against a player and no alcohol is...
  12. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Definitely if it was McGaw, McAuliffe or MacDougall Very embarassed now..........
  13. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    No worries ...:lol:
  14. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    You are so right - it is very hard to sift thru everything as a fan and come to terms - without the emotions swaying you.
  15. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    No please go back and re-read. I posted that to explain why I misinterpreted. TimmyB clarifyed it for us. Apologies to anyone I have confused.:oops:
  16. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Point taken. Thanks
  17. S

    GPS trial will put players on track

    Didn't Manly use this in the Leeds match? Be great if it can help with the reffing of a game... maybe speed up the video refs call;-)
  18. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Couldn't agree more Jonesy... Just on another note does anyone know the booking procedure? Stewart being there for 1 hour only (including fingerprinting) seems a small amount of time...
  19. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    I'm sorry - who I have I shot down, as said I'm merely speculating...:shock: Is that not allowed here? m I supposd to accept what the media has portrayed as truth?
  20. S

    Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

    Ok if that was the case fair enough. Initially the "crash tackle" was not mentioned and it was the father went to her defence. It was not mentioned even with his and the mothers subsequent reports to the media. In fact they went to neighbour to call the police.... The chat and the stairwell...

Latest posts

Top