What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Search results

  1. A

    Hadley's Comments

    *edited- too many dodgy insinuations*
  2. A

    benefit of the doubt rules doesnt exist.

    I think the amount of penalties and suspensions for high tackles is ridiculous when other tackle of the same standard are let go. can anyone explain to me how some-one can be suspended for a high tackle or get awarded judiciary points for high tackles when their arms are lower than there...
  3. A

    benefit of the doubt rules doesnt exist.

    If the benefit of the doubt rules exists why isn't every "REFS CALL" decision ruled a try. The only reason the ref is supposed to go to the video ref is if he has doubt regarding the try. then after veiwing all possible angles the video ref cant come up with a decision either way he rules "REFS...
  4. A

    IS THERE AN NRL DIRECTIVE TO TV BROADCASTERS RE REF DECISION

    Im just curious does anybody else think there is some sort of conspiracy or nrl directive to the TV broadcasting stations not to pick up on referee mistakes, because they miss alot of errors that radio commentators pick up on. plus they never show replays of contentious decisions anymore like...
View older results

Latest posts

Top