aussielegend77
Juniors
- Messages
- 24
If the benefit of the doubt rules exists why isn't every "REFS CALL" decision ruled a try. The only reason the ref is supposed to go to the video ref is if he has doubt regarding the try. then after veiwing all possible angles the video ref cant come up with a decision either way he rules "REFS CALL" meaning there is too much doubt to rule either way, therefore by definition of the rule it MUST be awarded a try "benefit of doubt goes to the attacking team".
how can a referee rule otherwise :?:
how can a referee rule otherwise :?: