What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'10 | R7 | ANZAC Day | Raiders 24-26 Rabbitohs | Canberra

Result: Raiders v Rabbitohs


  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .

Ziggy the God

First Grade
Messages
5,240
What a load of rubbish. Everything you're bleating about above were 100% correct decisions. I could come up with a list 5 times as long of occasions where the Rabbits received some extremely favourable (in other words, blatantly incorrect) decisions.

The fact of the matter is that Souths would have been nowhere near the Raiders today if it weren't for the men in pink. And that is an undeniable FACT.

The better team lost today, solely due to Robert Finch's inability to produce a first grade standard referee.


I have said my bit, as you have yours, and lets agree to disagree, because if you cannot even admit that you had the rub in the first half, then there is no point discussing it further.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Two people decided that match and they were both wearing pink. Their steadfast refusal to blow a penalty against Souths is what determined the game. Souths were all over the ruck, holding down every tackle, miles offside on every single play. Ridiculous.

As far as the Raiders were concerned, they were penalised for every little imaginary indiscretion, many of them either blatantly not penalties (the ridiculous flop penalty, which Souths did far worse far more often without penalty a prime example), or far softer than what Souths were allowed to get away with (Raiders penalised for a tackle round the shoulders in the first half, Souths allowed to hit Tongue around the throat in the second half, for example).

Congratulations on the win Souths, shame you needed one of the biggest hatchet jobs by an incompetent refereeing team that were so unashamedly one-sided, that I have ever seen in order to achieve it.

Congratulations to the Raiders forward pack, who proved themselves to be the superior of the wind bags playing for the opposition.

:lol:

surely this arse clown is a piss take?
 
Messages
4,007
Another oxygen thief who thinks a game is worth murdering over. In greatly disturbed by the amount of psychopathic fans we appear to have.

Just as we are greatly disturbed by your abhorrent blindness, shut up for once and lose with dignity you moron.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
What a load of rubbish. Everything you're bleating about above were 100% correct decisions. I could come up with a list 5 times as long of occasions where the Rabbits received some extremely favourable (in other words, blatantly incorrect) decisions.

The fact of the matter is that Souths would have been nowhere near the Raiders today if it weren't for the men in pink. And that is an undeniable FACT.

The better team lost today, solely due to Robert Finch's inability to produce a first grade standard referee.

That's right folks, the Canberra Raiders have NEVER been legitimately defeated.

ffs.

:roll:
 

Greenbits

Juniors
Messages
434
Two people decided that match and they were both wearing pink. Their steadfast refusal to blow a penalty against Souths is what determined the game. Souths were all over the ruck, holding down every tackle, miles offside on every single play. Ridiculous.

As far as the Raiders were concerned, they were penalised for every little imaginary indiscretion, many of them either blatantly not penalties (the ridiculous flop penalty, which Souths did far worse far more often without penalty a prime example), or far softer than what Souths were allowed to get away with (Raiders penalised for a tackle round the shoulders in the first half, Souths allowed to hit Tongue around the throat in the second half, for example).

Congratulations on the win Souths, shame you needed one of the biggest hatchet jobs by an incompetent refereeing team that were so unashamedly one-sided, that I have ever seen in order to achieve it.

Congratulations to the Raiders forward pack, who proved themselves to be the superior of the wind bags playing for the opposition.

:lol::lol::lol:

You never fail to entertain Skeepe.
 

Bodsy

Juniors
Messages
391
Two people decided that match and they were both wearing pink. Their steadfast refusal to blow a penalty against Souths is what determined the game. Souths were all over the ruck, holding down every tackle, miles offside on every single play. Ridiculous.

As far as the Raiders were concerned, they were penalised for every little imaginary indiscretion, many of them either blatantly not penalties (the ridiculous flop penalty, which Souths did far worse far more often without penalty a prime example), or far softer than what Souths were allowed to get away with (Raiders penalised for a tackle round the shoulders in the first half, Souths allowed to hit Tongue around the throat in the second half, for example).

Congratulations on the win Souths, shame you needed one of the biggest hatchet jobs by an incompetent refereeing team that were so unashamedly one-sided, that I have ever seen in order to achieve it.

Congratulations to the Raiders forward pack, who proved themselves to be the superior of the wind bags playing for the opposition.

To sum up that whole piece of crap you just wrote, You're an idiot. Take off your glasses and look at the game from unbiased eyes, that is the worst excuses.

If you want to find things to whinge about, what about the soft penalty in the last minute which could have decided the game. That was a soft penalty.

In case you didn't know Raiders were offside for some of the game too, not just the Rabbitohs mate. The whole game the refs had a short ten, it was fair throughout the game.

The Flop penalty was pretty much common sense, a guy is on the ground and another guys come in over the top when he's pretty much surrended. Flop every day of the week sir.

Also the reason you lost the game is because The Faiders simply weren't good enough for 80 minutes of football and the sooner you stop blaming the refs every week for the Raiders inability to finish off a team when you have a chance.

Take a loss and get on with life.
 

renouf

Juniors
Messages
1,977
Dugan's try in the first half was a no-try, clearly had his right foot on the line when he put the ball down.. why the video ref only looked at it once is beyond me..
 

Ziggy the God

First Grade
Messages
5,240
For what it is worth, I watch most of the Raiders games, as they are a good team to watch.

I know everyone rates Dugan (justly), but I especially think that Croker is underated. Campo needs to keep going to him as much as he can.

Also, I know Tongue has been a warrior for the club, but he has busted himself up so many times that he needs to get out of hooker and get a younger guy in there like Butriss. How many times do your guys get over the advantage line, then Tongue just runs sideways out of dummy half.

In any case, considering that I can't even remember the last time we beat you down there, I am glad that we don't have to worry about this trip again until next year.
 

Stagger eel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
65,814
poor weepe...they've never lost a game fair and square since 1982 and it appears they never will.

eat sh*t weepey!

to the fair minded Canberra fans, better luck next week guys..
 

Jason Maher

Immortal
Messages
35,991
Skeepe never fails to disappoint. Each week convinces me that little bit more that he is a rather elaborate troll. He comes across as deadly serious most of the time, which is probably why so many of us take his bait. But every so often he just goes so far over the top, I'm guessing just to remind us that he has been taking the piss the whole time. I think I have to applaud him for his efforts that have convinced so many that he is offering a serious opinion.
 
Messages
4,007
Skeepe never fails to disappoint. Each week convinces me that little bit more that he is a rather elaborate troll. He comes across as deadly serious most of the time, which is probably why so many of us take his bait. But every so often he just goes so far over the top, I'm guessing just to remind us that he has been taking the piss the whole time. I think I have to applaud him for his efforts that have convinced so many that he is offering a serious opinion.

You'd have to be nuts to keep up such a charade for so long, either that or incredibly bored with your everyday life.
 

Greenbits

Juniors
Messages
434
You'd have to be nuts to keep up such a charade for so long, either that or incredibly bored with your everyday life.

You'd have to be a raving luny to be so preoccupied with refereeing bias following an inept performance.

So which is it: nuts or luny? :-k
 

Latest posts

Top