hybrid_tiger
Coach
- Messages
- 11,684
I said equal , now go clean up your wet patch please , its quite disturbing
Not even close, go watch the game again you f**kwit.
I said equal , now go clean up your wet patch please , its quite disturbing
I said equal , now go clean up your wet patch please , its quite disturbing
Not even close, go watch the game again you f**kwit.
Don't forget the braindead recruitment.
So much attacking talent, so little defensive ability. You keep going on about how your defence will improve throughout the year but defence doesn't work that way - you just don't have the players. You need commited, hard-nosed players; to win a premiership you need a majority of those kind of guys. Then you just sprinkle a bit of attacking ability in there FOR THE WIN.
Souths have got it bass-ackwards. The reason you don't need so many great attacking players is because they can't all have the ball at once, and unlike in defence, you can choose who's involved and when.
Look at Burgess and Taylor - two of the worst defensive back-rowers in the game. You'd get better defence out of blokes on half the money they're on. Just because they're fast doesn't mean they should be in the back-row. Wide defence is about lateral movement.
John Morris is better than Issac Luke dude
Wests Tigers are a far better team than Souths. The players are better people. The fans are better looking, more intelligent and more polite. Our team colours are better and Wests Tigers have twice as much history to draw on. The area of representation is bigger, fresher and better. Every player in every position is better than their counterpart, including Ayshford being far better than Inglis, Farah making Luke look like a Toyota Cup player... even Jacob Miller is a better player than Sandow. Balmain Ryde Eastwood would have beaten Souths. Wests Magpies would have beaten Souths. Tigers NYC would have beaten Souths. Souths NYC would have beaten Souths. Grafton Ghosts would have beaten Souths.
In short, Souths are a bad team. The Tigers are a great team. In every way.
The following players aren't good at football.
Greg Inglis
John Sutton
Chris Sandow
Rhys Wesser
David Taylor
Michael Crocker
Sam Burgess
The rest are ok.
Thanks for your time.
Once again your basing it off of one game , who is the f**kwit , i Jake Friend and Riddell is better than Farah cause they outplayed him last week.
Once again your basing it off of one game , who is the f**kwit , i Jake Friend and Riddell is better than Farah cause they outplayed him last week.
Cam Smith is the best all-round hooker in the game but Farah and Luke are better attacking players.
Did you watch the game on Monday?
you are the fúckwit that can not pull your head out of your own arse
I don't think one game is a good enough basis for anything mate.
Your a touchy bastard aren't you cause i dont agree with you , i didnt say he is not a good player , Farah is better offensively than any hooker in the game but defensively he is a nothing hooker , i also rate Nathan Friend up there with Farah and Luke .
I also believ Farh has brains snaps in most games aswell doing stupid kicks or passes.
Just for you , Farah is god. Are you happy now ?
Its my opinion i dont ask you to agree with it . You are going to be so pissed when he does not get picked for origin this year
Defensively Farah is nothing? Are you basing this off one Origin play where Justin Poore was also involved?