What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'11 | R24 | Sat | Roosters 36-25 Sharks | SFS

R24: SYD v CRO

  • Sydney Roosters

    Votes: 10 76.9%

  • Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks

    Votes: 3 23.1%

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
roboshark

roboshark

Coach
Messages
17,974
no wonder the game is f**ked these days...the officials are bringing the game into disrepute

we do that well enough as a club
 
MSIH

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
Haha Masoe's killed Tagatese.

He'll stick to targeting halves in future Tagatese the nice person.
 
M2D2

M2D2

Bench
Messages
4,693
That was a hit and a half.
The BOD call was balls. But the obstruction NON call was worse. Easily a square up.
 
R

Roosterphin1

Juniors
Messages
436
roboshark said:
what about the obstruction try to chooks

square up maybe
Click to expand...

Wasnt obstruction mate. Ryles has every right to run alongside Hargreaves in support. Would have only been obstruction if Ryles was in front of him which he wasnt. He only went in front when Douglas pushed him. Correct call

Can someone tell me why it wasnt a Roosters penalty when Smith came third man in on a perfectly legal tackle?

f**king refs
 
M2D2

M2D2

Bench
Messages
4,693
Roosterphin1 said:
Wasnt obstruction mate. Ryles has every right to run alongside Hargreaves in support. Would have only been obstruction if Ryles was in front of him which he wasnt. He only went in front when Douglas pushed him. Correct call
Click to expand...

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
My word.
 
roboshark

roboshark

Coach
Messages
17,974
yes , yes they are...all of them unfortunately

bring back the days of kevin roberts, greg mccallum, kelvin jeffes :) etc
 
coolumsharkie

coolumsharkie

Referee
Messages
27,115
Roosterphin1 said:
Wasnt obstruction mate. Ryles has every right to run alongside Hargreaves in support. Would have only been obstruction if Ryles was in front of him which he wasnt. He only went in front when Douglas pushed him. Correct call

Can someone tell me why it wasnt a Roosters penalty when Smith came third man in on a perfectly legal tackle?

f**king refs
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
Danish

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,024
Can't stand it when games require "square up" tries.

Surely the obstruction try and glaringly obvious gallen knock on could be called correct FFS.

Roosters are much more fired up than sharks. If only there were another 5 minutes of that half we could have seen some real hits!

Hopefully we carry the fire into the 2nd half, although knowing us we'll end up conceding in the first 5 minutes instead
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top