Grail
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,390
If the Warriors didn't lose Konrad Hurell with 30 mins left then they would have won by 46. Fact.
lol. You need to look up the word "Fact" in the dictionary.
If the Warriors didn't lose Konrad Hurell with 30 mins left then they would have won by 46. Fact.
lol. You need to look up the word "Fact" in the dictionary.
You're delusional if you think Hayne scores a try from there.
if Hayne was this or hayne was that. No excuse. we can't blame the loss of hayne as to why we didn't win.
I thought the game was closer than the scoreline suggests. Both teams played well in areas.
On the Warriors - Maloney stepped up when needed. Where was Johnson?
On the Eels - Sandow showed what he can do given the opportunity and i thought Ben Roberts played well too. Good to see Willie Tonga back in the Blue and Gold and Sio and Blair both stood up when needed. Hard game against cowboys in round 3. We usually have good battles with them and are usually decided in close matches.I hope the boys can keep their heads up.
Sio should be fullback if hayne is definatley out and bring burt back on the wing with Ryan Morgan to replace Esi who looks in doubt with a Hammy injury.
I can understand why people think that Hayne going off changed the complexion of the game, but seasoned observers of the Warriors will realize that they sometimes start games like that, they'd hardly touched the ball at that stage, and they were always going to pose Parra problems once they got some ball.
It isn't about how the Warriors were going, it's about the fact Hayne is their best player and he went off after 15 minutes. They wouldn't have done much work with Sio at fb, and in attack he wasn't able to offer another option like Hayne does. Sandow became easier to handle and Roberts became invisible. They may not have won but they would have been a good deal closer. Can't believe anyone would argue that.