What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'12 | WiL R16 | Sat | Cowboys 40-18 Raiders | Dairy Farmers

Round 16 result: Cowboys v Raiders

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
Oh, I definitely agree that Stewart can defend- and his positioning in defense (which isn't measured in stats) is excellent.

I think some people might be influenced by Stewart's attempts in the last Origin to regather some kicks, some of which were poor. But it was a night in which Slater struggled also, and all the outside backs dropped it or misread the kicks a few times. Stewart's defense wasn't terrible that night, despite what some were saying, and it is usually excellent.

Dugan is a good defender too, and can pull out some good goal line try savers, and despite the article, so is Hoffman (he is safe as houses with most kicks). The bad defenders (like Gardner) really stand out- they get targeted by halves all the time. Not many of the top full backs get targeted- kicks and attack tends to target the much weaker wingers in the teams with good fullbacks.

Thanks for a great unbiased summation.
 

wibble

Bench
Messages
4,661
I'd argue Stewart's defence is far better than his attack. He makes a lot try savers for us. The only area of Stewarts game I'd put him behind other top fullbacks is his kick returns. He rarely attacks the line with speed and often goes down in a tackle. I suspect it a safety thing after 2 knees and a shoulder in his career.

He is a great finisher and is heavily involved in attacking plays for Manly. Overall I'd rather Stewart to Dugan myself. Dugan is good in his own way, and will get better with a decent coach.

Good points- I'd be happy with either at the Sharks. Try having our backline for a few years before worrying about comparing good players like Dugan and Stewart!

Poor Dugan, hope that is a sprain, doesn't look good.
 

Pete Cash

Post Whore
Messages
62,165
Yeah his ankle got pinned. Just one of those freakish things. Anyone would have been in trouble there.
 

Cowboys woo

Juniors
Messages
454
So you're saying a player on less money wouldn't have been badly injured then?

No I'm not.
The amount of time he has spent on the sideline injured WITH his pay packet, is just ridiculous IMO. You need your best paid players out on the park as much as possible
 

Pete Cash

Post Whore
Messages
62,165
What he's saying is its a waste to have however much Dugan is on spending half the time injured, same deal with Sam Burgess.

Can appreciate what he is saying but Dugan simply got his ankle pinned. This has nothing to do with being injury proned. It's just luck.

The tigers stuck by benji in his early days. The raiders will stick with Dugan but I don't care who you are the ankle is always going to lose in that position.
 

Sea_Eagles_Rock

First Grade
Messages
5,216
I'm just curious on this... Does any Raiders fan actually thing Dugan is a good 5/8?

I know injuries have damaged the season, but why would you move a solid fullback to position (imho) he is not naturally built for.
 

Latest posts

Top