The picture of Inglis touching the ball, whilst the ball was on the ground and in goal, shows how a 2D picture doesn't show the whole story, because he didn't ground the ball, but looking at the 2D picture you could say he did. Magpie4Eva, or what ever his name is, said you need 3D, but I say you need 4D (time). Still pictures don't show everything and the Inglis picture shows that. The game shouldn't be reffed like that. You have to watch it in motion (especially normal speed). It was close but the ref didn't think it was a try, and if he went to the video ref to check it, the video ref would have said it was inconclusive (looking at it at normal speed) so he would have said no try.