insert.pause
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,476
Hodges is going to keep conceding tries at fb he's too slow and always caught out of position.
Well the precedent was set in the Storm vs knights game. klown didn`t pay a penalty to Storm when ball was stolen from Billy from a knights player in an off side position. so if you agreed with it then stop sooking now.
You'd have to think they would risk Smith if they could. In a game this important.
You need to be one hundred percent sure of this. I didn't see it as a PT.
The concept is easy, penalty every day of the week, sin bin yep I'd have no issues with that. Penalty try :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Have a bex and a lie down. You're not coping well.
Explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.
Agree with the binning - but explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.
Agree with the binning - but explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.
Where did i say he wouldn't score ? Sin bin, yep. PT nope.
Did you get a kilo of sand delivered into your vagina today ?
If Hoffman makes the tackle at marker then the penalty is more blatent yet no one would be talking penalty try. Because Hoffman tries to get back, albeit in vain, now people talk penalty try. Just doesn't work imo.
I agree. It feels like there would be too many complications with calling a PT from an offside infringement.If Hoffman makes the tackle at marker then the penalty is more blatent yet no one would be talking penalty try. Because Hoffman tries to get back, albeit in vain, now people talk penalty try. Just doesn't work imo.
If Hoffman got back to the tryline (not saying he did) would that make him onside?
I'm the one who appears upset :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:It seems you have. You seem to be so upset about my opinion.
R U OK M8?