What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'14 // R26 // Fri // Storm 22-12 Broncos // AAMI

Round 26: Storm v Broncos


  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
Well the precedent was set in the Storm vs knights game. klown didn`t pay a penalty to Storm when ball was stolen from Billy from a knights player in an off side position. so if you agreed with it then stop sooking now.

Why would I give a f**k about what happens in a Storm v Knights game?
 

Frank_Grimes

First Grade
Messages
7,023
The concept is easy, penalty every day of the week, sin bin yep I'd have no issues with that. Penalty try :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


Have a bex and a lie down. You're not coping well.

Agree with the binning - but explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.
 

user_nat

Coach
Messages
12,410
Explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.

Seagulls.

A seagull sees McCullough and confuses him for a giant slow moving potato chip and swoops in. Luckily Hoffman was there to obstruct the seagulls vision.
 

Loose Cannon

Bench
Messages
4,100
I doubt in the history of the game there has ever been a penalty try awarded for inside the 10. Even flagrantly running back onside from the play before. It's a professional foul and a sin bin, but definitely will not be given a PT.
 

_Johnsy

Referee
Messages
28,481
Agree with the binning - but explain how McCullough wouldn't have scored if Hoffman didn't make the tackle.

Where did i say he wouldn't score ? Sin bin, yep. PT nope.

Did you get a kilo of sand delivered into your vagina today ?
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,488
If Hoffman makes the tackle at marker then the penalty is more blatent yet no one would be talking penalty try. Because Hoffman tries to get back, albeit in vain, now people talk penalty try. Just doesn't work imo.
 

user_nat

Coach
Messages
12,410
If Hoffman makes the tackle at marker then the penalty is more blatent yet no one would be talking penalty try. Because Hoffman tries to get back, albeit in vain, now people talk penalty try. Just doesn't work imo.

Wouldn't be talking sin bin either.

Really though, I don't think they would ever give that a penalty try. However, it would have been nice.
 

Ghoulies

Bench
Messages
3,948
If Hoffman makes the tackle at marker then the penalty is more blatent yet no one would be talking penalty try. Because Hoffman tries to get back, albeit in vain, now people talk penalty try. Just doesn't work imo.
I agree. It feels like there would be too many complications with calling a PT from an offside infringement.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,476
You can't call what Melbourne do tackling, it's wrestling and the game should have rubbed them out for it long ago.
 

_Johnsy

Referee
Messages
28,481
It seems you have. You seem to be so upset about my opinion.

R U OK M8?
I'm the one who appears upset :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Take a stroll back through this thread.

Oh Fwanky, you've given yourself too much credit again.

You want a penalty try awarded, love it.

Laughter isn't anger.
 

Snappy

Coach
Messages
11,844
If anyone other than Copely plays left centre, they will destroy us through that corridor
 

Latest posts

Top