What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

'14 // R9 // Mon // Eels 42-24 Sharks // Pirtek

Round 9: Eels v Sharks

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Is that you Henry? Please get off leagueunlimited while you are supposed to be helping adjudicate a football game

It's the stupid rule. The ref gave it no try which I thought was dubious. He went upstairs because he didn't know which means his opinion shouldn't matter. But under the rules stupidly it does. Most likely it was a try. But there wasn't conclusive vision to overturn. There's no benefit of the doubt anymore and it'd have been perfect there.
 

Sea_Eagles_Rock

First Grade
Messages
5,216
I think the onus should be on the ref in the quick tap... If they aren't onside, it is an infringement and a scrum should pack.
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
A player was in front of the line, right decision.

The video ref one earlier was hilarious though.
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Even if there was a bloke offside, no refs have the bottle to allow quick taps. It's ridiculous. Players barely try anymore because they know the ref usually for no reason will stop it
 

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,347
It's the stupid rule. The ref gave it no try which I thought was dubious. He went upstairs because he didn't know which means his opinion shouldn't matter. But under the rules stupidly it does. Most likely it was a try. But there wasn't conclusive vision to overturn. There's no benefit of the doubt anymore and it'd have been perfect there.

Admittedly watching it live I thought he was held up, even off the first replay you couldn't see anything conclusive.. But that second video clearly showed the ball flat on the ground, if that wasn't enough evidence to overturn a decision then they might as well scrap this whole new system. because it isn't working.
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Admittedly watching it live I thought he was held up, even off the first replay you couldn't see anything conclusive.. But that second video clearly showed the ball flat on the ground, if that wasn't enough evidence to overturn a decision then they might as well scrap this whole new system. because it isn't working.

The new system is seriously flawed. It should be benefit of the doubt all day long in that case. It's pathetic because I reckon Archer can legitimately now defend what we all think is likely a wrong decision.
 

Lemon Squash

First Grade
Messages
8,347
Nathan Peats is no superstar, but jeez for a little bloke he is as tough and competitive as they come... Has such a great tackling technique, he cuts props in half like peanut butter sambos.
 

Latest posts

Top