What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

14 Team SL and Merged Championship?

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,993
Less teams will make the comp boring as batsht. It’s bad enough with just 12.
Tv will pay less, clubs will have less home fixture revenue, french clubs means you’re selling an 8 team comp to uk media From audience perspective.

cuckoo, cuckoo.
Hahaha
Classic!
It really depends mate. If you're reducing the amount of teams to eliminate places like Leigh , Wakefield , Castleford ect and having more internationally relevant places.. with more talent stacked into fewer clubs..

Basically transforming a Super League that is representing backwater places nobody has heard of that play at a semi pro level..
Into..
A competition that has teams with more talent, playing higher quality football, representing larger, relevant cities..
With a more international presence..
That's worth more!

Your not selling international broadcast rights for anything significant when you're selling Leigh vs Wakefield..
Nobody knows or cares about those places besides those in the immediate geographical proximity.
Rugby League made NSW and QLD don't watch it... more talent, playing a better brand in a London vs Toulouse..
People may care, may follow, get ratings, get revenue..
Get it?
Probably not lol
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,952
Hahaha
Classic!
It really depends mate. If you're reducing the amount of teams to eliminate places like Leigh , Wakefield , Castleford ect and having more internationally relevant places.. with more talent stacked into fewer clubs..

Basically transforming a Super League that is representing backwater places nobody has heard of that play at a semi pro level..
Into..
A competition that has teams with more talent, playing higher quality football, representing larger, relevant cities..
With a more international presence..
That's worth more!

Your not selling international broadcast rights for anything significant when you're selling Leigh vs Wakefield..
Nobody knows or cares about those places besides those in the immediate geographical proximity.
Rugby League made NSW and QLD don't watch it... more talent, playing a better brand in a London vs Toulouse..
People may care, may follow, get ratings, get revenue..
Get it?
Probably not lol

Less teams will make the comp boring as batsht. It’s bad enough with just 12.
Tv will pay less, clubs will have less home fixture revenue, french clubs means you’re selling an 8 team comp to uk media From audience perspective.

cuckoo, cuckoo.

Large % of tv viewers live in South of England. Tiny clubs bring tiny number of viewers. Dropping Batley going to have huge impact?!
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,631
Hahaha
Classic!
It really depends mate. If you're reducing the amount of teams to eliminate places like Leigh , Wakefield , Castleford ect and having more internationally relevant places.. with more talent stacked into fewer clubs..

Basically transforming a Super League that is representing backwater places nobody has heard of that play at a semi pro level..
Into..
A competition that has teams with more talent, playing higher quality football, representing larger, relevant cities..
With a more international presence..
That's worth more!

Your not selling international broadcast rights for anything significant when you're selling Leigh vs Wakefield..
Nobody knows or cares about those places besides those in the immediate geographical proximity.
Rugby League made NSW and QLD don't watch it... more talent, playing a better brand in a London vs Toulouse..
People may care, may follow, get ratings, get revenue..
Get it?
Probably not lol
So destroy the heartlands where the actual games fans are in the hope that some may care to watch London v Toulouse? Cuckoo cuckoo.
I know let’s ditch Cronulla, dragons and canberra for Shanghai, singapore and kuala lumpar as they are much bigger well known cities lol.
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,952
So destroy the heartlands where the actual games fans are in the hope that some may care to watch London v Toulouse? .
I know let’s ditch Cronulla, dragons and canberra for Shanghai, singapore and kuala lumpar as they are much bigger well known cities lol.

Funny, with promotion relegation most of the smaller teams drop out of superleague after a short run. When Toronto and Toulouse were in superleague there were only ten english teams in top flight. Dropping a couple of teams who average around 4k fans a game will destroy the code..Cuckoo cuckoo
 

Taking The Two

Juniors
Messages
65
Well, that's depressing. Fourteen it is. Till it won't be again and that will probably be 2028. We don't have 12 fit for Super League as it is, so this will be a disaster. I was reall hopeful that the NRL would be the saviours but I'm struggling to see how this ends well and the two in unison.
 

England87

Juniors
Messages
154
The quality of footy has always been terrible, 14 teams freshens up the competition for me purely because Salford will drop out then are looking at bringing up York, Bradford & Toulouse.

York: Relatively new market for Top flight league club in a 150k small city that is culturally very different to the rest of Yorkshire.

Bradford: One of the most famous clubs/brands in the rugby league world.

Toulouse: Obvious
 

Taking The Two

Juniors
Messages
65
The quality of footy has always been terrible, 14 teams freshens up the competition for me purely because Salford will drop out then are looking at bringing up York, Bradford & Toulouse.

York: Relatively new market for Top flight league club in a 150k small city that is culturally very different to the rest of Yorkshire.

Bradford: One of the most famous clubs/brands in the rugby league world.

Toulouse: Obvious

Relative to what? The NRL? Obviously, it's lower. To take a low standard competition and water it down further by adding new sides, many who are some way behind the current lower standard sides in the comp, is like taking a beer, throwing a load of water into it and wondering why it takes longer to get hammered.

We could (and should, IMO) have retained 12, made some tough decisions about the current clubs, many of whom aren't up to scratch (Cas, Salford, Huddersfield especially), made some big calls on them and potentially brought in new markets, clubs who are close/at the standard with those lower standard existing clubs but offer the sport growth and gone in that direction by locking them in permanently. I'm not sure Cas vs York in deepest February in front of 3100 is "fresh" or offers anything more commercially than is the case now. I'm also not sure 11th place Huddersfield v 12th place Bradford come September of 2026 is anything short of a box ticking exercise as they'll have nothing to play for.
 

England87

Juniors
Messages
154
Super League should no longer be in the rugby league business, it needs to be in the 100% entertainment business. More markets, more eye balls, more product to sell, better tv rights etc.

The argument that the league should be smaller because its piss poor compared to the NRL is like saying the NBL should be a 4 team comp because its shit compared to the NBA.
 

Taking The Two

Juniors
Messages
65
Super League should no longer be in the rugby league business, it needs to be in the 100% entertainment business. More markets, more eye balls, more product to sell, better tv rights etc.

The argument that the league should be smaller because its piss poor compared to the NRL is like saying the NBL should be a 4 team comp because its shit compared to the NBA.

It is in the entertainment business. The problem is the quality of the entertainment is lower than what you can get elsewhere. Football, Rugby, Cricket, Darts, F1, it's a heavily saturated market and the sport here cannot compete financially. We have had a third of the competition's Head Coaches fined in the past week because of comments on referees, the game's aren't particularly entertaining and many of the clubs themselves are living in the past, aren't keeping up with modern technology, are averse to change, don't know how to create an entertainment venue or event and don't have the capabilities to monetise themselves or their players, who aren't just gladiatorial, they have stories, they have pasts, they have quirks and unique things about them.

The idea shouldn't simply be lets throw out loads of really poor entertainment (on and off the pitch) and just hope that people like it and turn up again and again. If Rugby League in the UK wanted to something, it should have done something different, not something we've already done, attempted to dress up as something new and exciting only to then change our minds again 24 months down the line, which a return to 14 teams is. It wasn't popular before, games were meaningless, crowds dropped off when games were dead from halfway onwards, we had teams in the bottom half of the table able to win the Grand Final and we had real poor players competing in the league (and team after team going to the wall). If we wanted to try and attract a new audience or to re-engage with an audience, I'd rather the administrators here do something different, something we haven't tried.

Nobody has made an argument that you're pushing there about the NRL. If we are brutally honest, which I don't think we are and I think people genuinely think we can beat Australia in the Ashes, we are lightyears behind them on and off the pitch and I don't think we need to be worrying about them or trying to get close(r) to them. Lets concentrate on our controllables. Let's get 12 clubs up to a standard - they have multiple sides across all formats of the sport, let's get them having pathways and community arms of their clubs, lets get clubs using social media properly, let's get clubs growing their crowds and their revenue streams. Lets not just go "lets just get rid of loop fixtures, all our problems will be solved" because they won't be.
 

England87

Juniors
Messages
154
No mate, need to grow the pot and encourage investment. The thousands of new York & Toulouse fans are not watching their team saying to themselves "This is shit compared to NRL/Darts/Boxing'' European sports fans dont think like that.
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,993
So destroy the heartlands where the actual games fans are in the hope that some may care to watch London v Toulouse? Cuckoo cuckoo.
I know let’s ditch Cronulla, dragons and canberra for Shanghai, singapore and kuala lumpar as they are much bigger well known cities lol.
Half the team have spent most of their existence in the championship anyway.
Just send them back to where they belong.

Small towns belong in the Championship, they have no place in what should be a prestigious international competition.
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,993
It is in the entertainment business. The problem is the quality of the entertainment is lower than what you can get elsewhere. Football, Rugby, Cricket, Darts, F1, it's a heavily saturated market and the sport here cannot compete financially. We have had a third of the competition's Head Coaches fined in the past week because of comments on referees, the game's aren't particularly entertaining and many of the clubs themselves are living in the past, aren't keeping up with modern technology, are averse to change, don't know how to create an entertainment venue or event and don't have the capabilities to monetise themselves or their players, who aren't just gladiatorial, they have stories, they have pasts, they have quirks and unique things about them.

The idea shouldn't simply be lets throw out loads of really poor entertainment (on and off the pitch) and just hope that people like it and turn up again and again. If Rugby League in the UK wanted to something, it should have done something different, not something we've already done, attempted to dress up as something new and exciting only to then change our minds again 24 months down the line, which a return to 14 teams is. It wasn't popular before, games were meaningless, crowds dropped off when games were dead from halfway onwards, we had teams in the bottom half of the table able to win the Grand Final and we had real poor players competing in the league (and team after team going to the wall). If we wanted to try and attract a new audience or to re-engage with an audience, I'd rather the administrators here do something different, something we haven't tried.

Nobody has made an argument that you're pushing there about the NRL. If we are brutally honest, which I don't think we are and I think people genuinely think we can beat Australia in the Ashes, we are lightyears behind them on and off the pitch and I don't think we need to be worrying about them or trying to get close(r) to them. Lets concentrate on our controllables. Let's get 12 clubs up to a standard - they have multiple sides across all formats of the sport, let's get them having pathways and community arms of their clubs, lets get clubs using social media properly, let's get clubs growing their crowds and their revenue streams. Lets not just go "lets just get rid of loop fixtures, all our problems will be solved" because they won't be.
I think you make some good points. With the teams you have currently are tapped out for growth, which means you risk contraction..
Grow or die a slow death.
I'd rather the NRL run a ten team comp that encompasses areas that present growth opportunities.. but look like a 14 team comp will happen to try for growth..
All I'll say is:
Mark thier entry for 2027 to give themselves time to prepare and hopefully that quality doesn't dilute too much.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
73,631
I’m in favour of 14 clubs but would have preferred the two new teams came in 2027 to give them a year to build a squad. I dont understand the rush to get them in next year. At least we get rid of the much hated loop fixtures.

the top 12 by Img grading and two extra clubs by panel smacks of wood steering things to get Bradford and London back in.

of the 12 clubs 9 voted yes, the two hull clubs voted no and wigan abstained, allegedly.
 

axe&smash&crush

Juniors
Messages
447
Punt Salford, bring in Bradford, Toulouse and one other.

Play 27 rounds. Play everyone twice - home and away and a rivals round for magic round to build up the event for the betterment of the game.

Magic round could be really cool, have the 12 English teams play in Newcastle. Surely something like this would be improved crowd puller and create quite the event
Hull fc v Hull kr
Wigan v Saints
Leigh v Warrington
Leeds v Bradford
Castleford v Wakey
Hudderfield v team 14

The two French teams can play match in France for a special cup on the Friday night of magic round

Challenge cup at Wembley. French teams should be excluded from challenge cup, can’t have Catalans v huddersfield.
 

Taking The Two

Juniors
Messages
65
Magic Weekend likely to be scrapped and EIGHT teams in the play-offs. It’s that depressing that it’s almost funny now. It is exactly what we did before during 2009-2014. It’s not new, it’s not different, it didn’t work then, it’s not going to now.

How do you sit in front of Sky, BBC, DAZN or any credible TV broadcaster and one of your USP’s is a team in the bottom half of the table can be crowned champions? It’s revisiting the past and the past failings. It’s staggering that these club owners have ever been successful businessmen when they act like this when it comes to sport.
 

RedVee

First Grade
Messages
7,773
Some weeks (months?) ago people were talking about Huddersfield being punted along with Salford. That’s not happening?
 

Latest posts

Top