'15 | R14 | Sat 6pm AEST | WAR 21-25 SYD | Mt Smart

[I Bleed Maroon]

That blonde Rorters debutant is having a tough debut

 

[Snappy]

cant pass off the ground like that. Ball carrying hand touched the ground

 

[skeepe]

Under the precedent set by the Croker no try, it can't be a try.

 

[Meth]

Held, no try.

meltdown in 4, 3, 2, 1...

 

[Rebel]

That makes up for the one last week against ys from Goodwin

 

[Meth]

cant pass off the ground like that. Ball carrying hand touched the ground

nobody was touching him?and I think he found his left foot before passing

 

[I Bleed Maroon]

:lol: There's your so called "consistency", folks

 

[blacklock]

Wow.

 

[typicalfan]

Oh no be prepared for some pretty witty memes or gifs here.

 

[DiegoNT]

nobody was touching him?and I think he found his left foot before passing

That's the way I saw it to

 

[skeepe]

Well said Vossy, exactly the same as the Croker one, but Archer backed that call so it must follow that we just saw an incorrect call.

 

[Danish]

From the rule book:

Hand on player already grounded
(d) when he is lying on the ground and an opponent places a hand on him.

Is it honestly that f**king hard for refs to apply such a basic thing?

 

[Danish]

That blonde Rorters debutant is having a tough debut

He is no a debutant, although I wouldn't expect you of all people to have ever heard of him

 

[Meth]

From the rule book:

Hand on player already grounded
(d) when he is lying on the ground and an opponent places a hand on him.

Is it honestly that f**king hard for refs to apply such a basic thing?

I'd have to re-watch it, but I thought he was finding his feet before Hastings got a hand to him.

 

[TheFrog]

From the rule book:

Hand on player already grounded
(d) when he is lying on the ground and an opponent places a hand on him.

Is it honestly that f**king hard for refs to apply such a basic thing?

There was no hand on him until he'd resumed his progress, in other words he was never tackled.

 

[andrew057]

nobody was touching him?and I think he found his left foot before passing

Youre wrong.

Disgraceful. These guys just make it up.

 

[Meth]

Well said Vossy, exactly the same as the Croker one, but Archer backed that call so it must follow that we just saw an incorrect call.

A wrong call one week doesn't necessitate a wrong call the next

 

[typicalfan]

There was no hand on him until he'd resumed his progress, in other words he was never tackled.

Yep that is how I saw it.

 

[Willow]

From the rule book:

Hand on player already grounded
(d) when he is lying on the ground and an opponent places a hand on him.

Is it honestly that f**king hard for refs to apply such a basic thing?

Not held.

 

[andrew057]

There was no hand on him until he'd resumed his progress, in other words he was never tackled.

Wrong as well.

The ball was on the ground, and a Roosters player was touching him. Clear tackle.