Thanks to all that commented positively. I am in my late 50s and have followed the Dragon's all my life (also follow Collingwood - we all have sinned sometime in our lives). I like the banter and have pissed my pants laughing at some of the witty comments on the forum (no, not incontinence due to my age) but not when it gets abusive just because you don't agree with someone's view.
Agree that putting nil fee was silly on behalf of the consortium. I get the Dolphins had asset backing and established pathways but to pay a nil fee and then ask another entrant just a couple of years later to pay millions is not right and just looks like a cash grab by the NRL. If the NRL was looking for a bank guarantee in case the shit hits the fan then say so and nominate a figure in the document so all potential bidders know what is required of them and they can budget accordingly. The WA consortium means a new market and an extra game to sell to the broadcasters, so surely that is worth something.
Is there a hidden agenda and the NRL doesn't want Cumins? Who knows. But if the NRL wants to put a team in WA, let's see if anyone else puts a proposal forward as you would assume there is no one at this stage as the NRL would have just moved on and started discussing with them and we have not heard anything during this process of another interested party for WA.
From outside looking in it looks unprofessional from both sides.
Seriously the WA bidder is bidding
That's unprofessional,
and yeah I'm fairly sure nobody wants cumins involved, why would he be told NOT to talk to the arlc by his own people, this was atleast 6-9months ago....
This WA govt wants a team there, NRL wants team there, Bears want to be there, how can you fk this up? By saying we'll offer you zero, coz we have our own costs to deal with FFS
I can't see why the other NRL clubs would want to expand, when you got a bidder who just wants to reap the benefits of the NRL profits, but won't put in now, just to be part of it, what a fkn joke