warriors 95
Juniors
- Messages
- 131
Hope so as the NRL really can’t back out now and leave Perth in the lurch.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Hope so as the NRL really can’t back out now and leave Perth in the lurch.
Yes , but now that PVL has confirmed that the bears will be team 18 they should be talking to other bids. If there is a stronger bid than the Perth one they'd be silly not to have a chat.
It’ll be Perth/WA and Bears together mate. That’s it.
Perth bears are 100 percent
Most likely, but the bears should be looking at other options. Sitting in the corner waiting to be told what is going to happen could be risky.
And put at risk getting a licence back into the NRL?
No should, could, would etc. WA/Bears. That’s it.
He really doesn’t like the idea of Perth bears does he
The Bears have been publicly backed by the games most powerful leader to be the Perth team. It’s wild to suggest that should be put at risk by the Bears joining other bids at this stage.
Lot of people here live in the land of delusion where they ignore all the media articles and cling onto their own desires
Okay.
Funnily enough the longer the licence fee isnt paid, the less time there is for recruiting for the '27 to start, especially since you'd need longer than what the dolphins got.... tick tok
That would mean a significant short term spend for them with no guarantee of coming close to covering the expense of setting up, running and paying a licese fee when it came to selling the license. Last time they had to do that they only recouped $4mill back through sale of the two licenses. Its hard to see them having an appetite for that level of risk unless they felt it was essential to leveraging a major increase in Tv money, then it may well seem worth it regardless of license value when it came to selling it.
yes Vlad is hamstringing this a treat, what a balls up!
You're arguing that Perth isn't a viable financial concern here.That would mean a significant short term spend for them with no guarantee of coming close to covering the expense of setting up, running and paying a licese fee when it came to selling the license. Last time they had to do that they only recouped $4mill back through sale of the two licenses. Its hard to see them having an appetite for that level of risk unless they felt it was essential to leveraging a major increase in Tv money, then it may well seem worth it regardless of license value when it came to selling it.
It would be hilarious if they did that then the Perth bid were the only buyers for it in 5 years time and it cost them less than the $30mill they have currently put up
No I'm arguing that its quiet likely an NRL license wouldn't be sold for $50mill+, given the evidence of past sales. And that's what it will cost to set up and run a new club. If the NRl want to be altruistic and poor $50mill of the games money into a Perth club instead of accepting the Western Bears $30mill bid then so be it, bring it on! Can you see it?
The other bids aren't on the west coast in AFL heartland trying to pull players away from Brisbane/Sydney/NZ, they'll have a much easily fist of it than perf would, don't matter tho you needed to have a licence before blowing that 30 mil on club set up anyways, and were never gonna get one with that mindset of expecting handouts at every turn
Fantasy world. Have another beer.It would be hilarious if they did that then the Perth bid were the only buyers for it in 5 years time and it cost them less than the $30mill they have currently put up
