What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

1st Test: Australia v South Africa at Brisbane 9-13 Nov

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,132
Missed it by that much.

Unlucky Hilf but fair & good call from the umpires. Just hope they're consistent.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
shouldn't lose the review for that, this has the potential to be very uncomfortable for Australia for the rest of the innings
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
shit rule that they're saying the umpire is right no matter which way he rules

defies logic
 

Hutty1986

Immortal
Messages
34,034
shouldn't lose the review for that, this has the potential to be very uncomfortable for Australia for the rest of the innings

Geez that first review is costly now.. I can understand them giving it a crack at that point but f**k we might need a slice of luck from time to time to get through this quality SA line-up.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
well, the review helped get rid of Smith, and South Africa's 3, 4, and 5 are all hard to dismiss top quality batsmen, so losing the reviews now is really uncomfortable for Australia.

The first review I didn't understand, the appeals weren't even confident, might teach Clarkey a lesson about the use of reviews
 

Bgoodorgoodatit

Juniors
Messages
1,511
Missed it by that much.

Unlucky Hilf but fair & good call from the umpires. Just hope they're consistent.


how is it a good call?

the only reason it was not out was because less than 50% of the ball pitched in line according to hawkeye.

i can understand when the ball has a long distnace to travel to the stumps they take in a margin of error for the electronic tracking.

however in that case when its clear the ball is hitting the stumps and clearly putched in line the 3rd umpire should be able to override.
 
Messages
15,353
shouldn't lose the review for that, this has the potential to be very uncomfortable for Australia for the rest of the innings

I don't think you should lose a review for an umpires call either, if the call goes the way and the batsmen refer it then they'd be out.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
that's a wicket, but it brings Kallis out in place of Petersen, so it's not necessarily all that good for Australia

Petersen sort of gave it away there South Africa 2/119
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
That is the only way that clown Bowden couldn't screw us! THREE plumb lbw's not given...go back to NZ you dropkick!
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,132
how is it a good call?

the only reason it was not out was because less than 50% of the ball pitched in line according to hawkeye.

For basically that reason.

BotD should always go with the batsmen and while it's a little hard to swallow by the rules and technology the umpire was right.

Deserves credit for it.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
benefit of the doubt isn't with the batsman though, it's with the umpire. Had the umpire called it out and the batsman reviewed it, the batsman would have remained out
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,350
benefit of the doubt isn't with the batsman though, it's with the umpire. Had the umpire called it out and the batsman reviewed it, the batsman would have remained out

Why couldn't someone have tossed Bowden into the Pacific Ocaen! Just sucks as an umpire! He can't see and he is a clown!
 

Latest posts

Top