- Messages
- 69,373
shocked chanderpaul didnt refer that
I mean katich had his back to him when he caught it :roll:
WI 3/39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2a6f/b2a6f7956fef23a6790ef183a374ffc4ce72c46a" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
I mean katich had his back to him when he caught it :roll:
WI 3/39
Shame Gould has decided to put his finger up to a line-ball LBW to give Barath out. Could have gone either way (and mind you it all went Australia's way in our innings when Gould was at that end)
On a further look, it really looked like going down leg side
A shame ...
I am hoping Barath will go all the way and get a century on debut.
This Technology is ridicolous, Pontings LBW in the 1st innings was more out then Baraths LBW which is surely going dwn leg.
all the tight calls are going to the aussies. but the main point out of this is, its not changed the result of the game because the aussies were dominate all game. but if this was a closer game this technology could be the cause of ruining a game of cricket
all the tight calls are going to Australia? :lol:
You obviously didnt see how Johnson was given out
Sunshines LBW wasnt a lay down conviction either
The review system is to get rid of the shocking calls not the 50/50 ones. Not too fussed if the 50/50 stays with what the umpire called.