Bazal
Post Whore
- Messages
- 103,173
Clarke's record as captain overall is about par for Australian test captains (and poor compared to Ponting, Waugh, Taylor) - funnily enough great teams develop great captaincy records.
Clarke like Ponting had some horrific series losses - I dislike most things I hear about him, but on field he did ok for the most part as captain
The difference between Clarke and Ponting is the situation the team was in at the beginning and end of their tenure. Ponting took over the best team in the world and left it a shambles. Yeah, he lost some absolute greats over that time but he fostered an environment where mediocrity was accepted readily so long as you were buddies with his buddies, he was tactically inept, and because he was a popular leader he managed to turn the Aussie team into a popularity contest.
Clarke came into a side well and truly on the slide and took it back to the top. He shattered Ponting's clique that had controlled the side for so long and, whether he was well liked or not, turned it back into a functioning team. He was a far better tactician even if he wasn't the people person Ponting was (and if you weren't Ponting's mate he wasn't much of a people person).
I genuinely believe the major reason Ponting is perceived higher than Clarke is that Aussie cricket fans expect their captains to fit a stereotype, and Clarke definitely didn't. Ponting was the stereotype.