Maybe, but the reality is we just don't have depth - so there are always 3+/- a few plodders in any team we field - in this lineup Nicholls is a stand-out, but Astle and CDG are plod too...Henry Nicholls must have some comprising photo’s of someone high up on NZ cricket???
Munro would be perfect as a Counter attacking 5 especially with the solid Watling following him at 6.Maybe, but the reality is we just don't have depth - so there are always 3+/- a few plodders in any team we field - in this lineup Nicholls is a stand-out, but Astle and CDG are plod too...
Munro would be the obvious person to bat at 5 instead of Nicholls, but he's ditched proper cricket, and the others have done even less than Henry - Watling is fine as a 6, but as always if the new ball gets through our top 4 we are in some trouble
Agree - he's done well in first class cricket, so deserved a bit of a chance - and when he pulls his head in he's much more effective, and still very aggressiveMunro would be perfect as a Counter attacking 5 especially with the solid Watling following him at 6.
Shame he has gone that way.
Kiwis win the toss and will bat.
The best thing about pink ball cricket, according Scott Styrofoam is that 'strategy plays a part'.
That's called test cricket Scott, its beem goimg on for about 140 years
Cook out as boult strikes.