D
Deleted member 10972
Guest
When comparing defence, don?t forget that the 02-04 sides were the best defensively in an era of high scoring games. That?s not to take away from the 6 shutouts this year which is quite simply amazing.
The 2003 team sometimes gets left behind in the wake of 02 and 04 but that team didn?t lose a game by more than 8 points until the GF which they lost by 12. This years team was also great in that area with the round 1 loss of 18 points being by far the highest with the Warriors (11 points) being next highest.
To be fair, the 2003 team is basically 2004 without Tupou (hadn't debuted yet), Cusack (injured) and Hodges (injured). Lomu, Catic and Byrne aren't exactly upgrades on those three. But I guess when people refer to the 2004 team, they are referring essentially to the 2003/2004 squad that was the same team bar a few miniscule changes in which 2004 is generally considered to be stronger.