Did anyone decide which 2 of the nominees should be left off the voting? We all need to be on the same page here. This is very important.
Also shows that as social media users, we're still a vast minority of Panther fans and club members.
Just goes to show that if we want to role the current board, there needs to be a joint effort. Nads and Nigel couldn't agree on what 2 candidates should be left off, so they diluted there votes and suffered.
Also shows that as social media users, we're still a vast minority of Panther fans and club members.
Or maybe the majority of social media users are lazy pr*&ks that won't get off their asses and go and vote, or maybe used to the computer doing everything for them?
Feltis said the vote showed overwhelming support. hahahahaha.
Got to wonder how many more people might have gone along and voted if they'd gotten their mail out at a reasonable time. I'm hearing stories of people receiving it last week.
Well, as every voter had to mark nine squares and there were only two new candidates, what else could they have done? If Nigel and Nads had not stood, there probably would have been around 150-200 fewer voters. Pathetic really.Well the people that got along and voted did support the existing Board by a big majority.