What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 Jerseys, Logos & Sponsorship Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

beave

Coach
Messages
15,680
That Storm white jersey, why the f**k couldn't they just do the sponsor in navy blue and get rid of the box???
 

LESStar58

Referee
Messages
25,496
Storm indeed will have BLK badging:

1.jpg
3.jpg

Tiger Air will also be the bottom of jersey sponsor.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,417
I much prefer the gold Parra jersey to the blue one. I like the 1947 bit below the collar on the back. Nice touch. It's not necessary, especially given it's on the logo, but I like it.
 
Messages
4,980
Why dyldam box? Stupid.

White on yellow/gold isn't the most conducive to creating a clear and legible logo, hence the box.

I'm no fan of "box" logos, particularly when it sits over over design elements on a jersey (recent Rabbitohs and Storm jerseys spring to mind). Thankfully it doesn't impact the Eels jersey too much, but the reality is that if a sponsor has a strong, consistent logo, they aren't likely to be changing it just so that it fits in well with the rest of the jersey.

At least the box is in "team colours", not a stock standard black or white.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,993
Why dyldam box? Stupid.

1. Dyldam's brand is the word with orange dots. The orange dots would be completely lost on the gold jersey.

2. At least they didn't make it a white box.

Small mercies, GAZF. Small mercies.
 

beave

Coach
Messages
15,680
I get what you lads are saying about the box needed for the Dyldam sponsor, but surely the use of black highlighting around words and dots would make it stand out on the yellow background?
 

GAZF

First Grade
Messages
8,758
White on yellow/gold isn't the most conducive to creating a clear and legible logo, hence the box.

I'm no fan of "box" logos, particularly when it sits over over design elements on a jersey (recent Rabbitohs and Storm jerseys spring to mind). Thankfully it doesn't impact the Eels jersey too much, but the reality is that if a sponsor has a strong, consistent logo, they aren't likely to be changing it just so that it fits in well with the rest of the jersey.

At least the box is in "team colours", not a stock standard black or white.

1. Dyldam's brand is the word with orange dots. The orange dots would be completely lost on the gold jersey.

2. At least they didn't make it a white box.

Small mercies, GAZF. Small mercies.

How about going with the solid blue bar like their last gold jersey then? You'd have to get rid of the chest stripes as its too much clutter. Seems strange that they make such an effort to make a clean home design with great sponsor integration and then slap a big blue box on the away. Also, will dyldam lose brand recognition if their dots aren't orange? The name on its own is memorable enough: half dildo, half dental dam.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top