thorson1987
Coach
- Messages
- 16,907
Are those Roosters socks red with black and white? Or is it just my monitor and they're actually red with dark blue and white?
I'd say very dark blue, but they look black to me aswell.
Are those Roosters socks red with black and white? Or is it just my monitor and they're actually red with dark blue and white?
Seems like all other sports are actually dropping merch prices next year
Most a league , afl , cricket shirts are sub $100 now
And Nrl still tries for the $189 mark
I mean really ???
No way they cost more than $20 to make in china
And funnily enough, S15 jerseys go for the same as NRL.
essentially it is a national team can't see too many aussies being recruited to play over there!I'm surprised they went with the national teams logo.
THey really need to drop the price of the infant jerseys. I can't afford to pay or justify $99.95 for a jersey for my 1 year old when he will outgrow it in no time. He had his first jersey last year when the end of year clearances were on, but the clearance price is what the regular price should be IMO.
A full grown adult who can wear the jersey until it's destroyed or whatever, is getting his moneys worth. But those baby jerseys have about 20% of the fabric and are more then half the price. A baby will outgrow it in no time and it's then only good for grabbing autographs and trying to frame it or collect it.
I think there would be far better jersey sales int his market if they were around the $49.95 mark and the added sales would probably be more then enough to make up for any money lost on charging twice that and moving less volume.
Even then $50 is a bit rich for a nylon shirt they'll outgrow in less than 12 months
I'm surprised they went with the national teams logo.
essentially it is a national team can't see too many aussies being recruited to play over there!