East Coast Tiger
Coach
- Messages
- 14,139
I think it's pointless to play games in front of 6,000 in Sydney despite it being the "RL capital" when they could be taken to places that don't normally get games. You either have 6,000 people who have probably been to every other game all year or you can have any number of new people who would otherwise never go to a game. It's pretty straight forward I'd say. It's growing the game versus not growing the game. The scary thing is we know which side the NRL is on in that one.Perth Red is saying that the reason that the crowds in Perth have dropped from 15k to about 7K over the last 2 years is because the locals that would normally go to the games have recognised that there is no new Perth NRL team on the horizon...apparently the two games themselves can't be enjoyed for what they are if they don't ulimitaley lead to the goal of Perth getting their own team in the near future...
If this is indeed the case ( I am dubious myself) , then it seems pointless to me to persevere with these games, particularly given the added expense involved in flying the teams over from the East or Auckland...
But to make this about Perth at all when the entire sport has woken up to the fact Sydney's crowds are appalling is clear deflection from the real issue. The reality is, the trolls on here are butt hurt over Perth Red so much that he now defines their attitude to Perth as an NRL venue. Just think how pathetic that is.