What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2017 NRL Club Membership

taipan

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Decided to get off my fat a*se and give update as of now'
Broncos 29,094
Raiders 16,117
Bulldogs 16,900
Sharks 12,762
Titans 9,360
Sea Eagles 11,727
Storm 17,138
Knights 12,255
Cowboys 14,413
Eels 18,894
Panthers 14,023
Rabbits 28,073
Dragons 15,419
Roosters 12,803
Warriors 13,569
Tigers 13,134

TOTAL 255,681 as of 7th March 10pm.

We are flaming it number wise.
 
Perth Red

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,587
Which clubs are likely to break the 20k barrier in next year or so?
Warriors still underwhelm the most and have the biggest growth potential,
looks like Storm wil put many traditional clubs to shame and get there soon,
if Newcastle ever get the club sorted out they would have to be a good bet.
Which of the Sydney clubs have the potential to top Souths? Bulldogs and eels would seem the most likely?
 
Pete Cash

Pete Cash

Post Whore
Messages
62,165
If the raiders win a premiership I reckon the potential is there. Big ask based on our recent history though
 
juro

juro

Bench
Messages
3,825
Just looking at the number of followers on twitter (a rough guide to followers), the rankings are:
1. Broncos - 110k
2. Storm - 95k
3. Warriors - 95k
4. Souths - 93k
5. Bulldogs - 76k
6. Tigers - 64k
7. Cowboys - 62k
8. Roosters - 61k
9. Manly - 56k
10. Titans - 56k
11. Sharks - 55k
12. Eels - 53k
13. Dragons - 49k
14. Panthers - 48k
15. Knights - 48k
16. Raiders - 45k

Ratios of twitter followers to members are:
1. Raiders - 2.77
2. Eels - 2.80
3. Dragons - 3.17
4. Souths - 3.30
5. Panthers - 3.42
6. Broncos - 3.71
7. Knights - 3.88
8. Cowboys - 4.08
9. Sharks - 4.32
10. Bulldogs - 4.49
11. Roosters - 4.67
12. Tigers - 4.77
13. Manly - 4.81
14. Storm - 5.53
15. Titans - 5.94
16. Warriors - 6.33
ALL CLUBS COMBINED - 4.11

So, what can we draw from this? Either the clubs at the top of the list (Raiders, Eels, Dragons, etc) have done a good job in converting their general followers into becoming members or they need to do a better job with their social media.

On the flipside, either the clubs at the bottom of the list (Warriors, Titans and Storm) do a great job with their social media, or they are very poor at converting these followers into members. They may also have the greatest potential to increase their memberships in the near future.
 
jim_57

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,602
juro said:
Just looking at the number of followers on twitter (a rough guide to followers), the rankings are:
1. Broncos - 110k
2. Storm - 95k
3. Warriors - 95k
4. Souths - 93k
5. Bulldogs - 76k
6. Tigers - 64k
7. Cowboys - 62k
8. Roosters - 61k
9. Manly - 56k
10. Titans - 56k
11. Sharks - 55k
12. Eels - 53k
13. Dragons - 49k
14. Panthers - 48k
15. Knights - 48k
16. Raiders - 45k

Ratios of twitter followers to members are:
1. Raiders - 2.77
2. Eels - 2.80
3. Dragons - 3.17
4. Souths - 3.30
5. Panthers - 3.42
6. Broncos - 3.71
7. Knights - 3.88
8. Cowboys - 4.08
9. Sharks - 4.32
10. Bulldogs - 4.49
11. Roosters - 4.67
12. Tigers - 4.77
13. Manly - 4.81
14. Storm - 5.53
15. Titans - 5.94
16. Warriors - 6.33
ALL CLUBS COMBINED - 4.11

So, what can we draw from this? Either the clubs at the top of the list (Raiders, Eels, Dragons, etc) have done a good job in converting their general followers into becoming members or they need to do a better job with their social media.

On the flipside, either the clubs at the bottom of the list (Warriors, Titans and Storm) do a great job with their social media, or they are very poor at converting these followers into members. They may also have the greatest potential to increase their memberships in the near future.
Click to expand...

I've seen this done with Facebook, there is the slight flaw though in that fans can follow all NRL clubs just for interests sake and only ever be a possible fan/member of 1 club.
 
juro

juro

Bench
Messages
3,825
jim_57 said:
I've seen this done with Facebook, there is the slight flaw though in that fans can follow all NRL clubs just for interests sake and only ever be a possible fan/member of 1 club.
Click to expand...
Yes, that's why I said it was only a rough guide.
 
PaulyTom

PaulyTom

Juniors
Messages
1,075
Can you do a Facebook followers ranking too?

juro said:
Just looking at the number of followers on twitter (a rough guide to followers), the rankings are:
1. Broncos - 110k
2. Storm - 95k
3. Warriors - 95k
4. Souths - 93k
5. Bulldogs - 76k
6. Tigers - 64k
7. Cowboys - 62k
8. Roosters - 61k
9. Manly - 56k
10. Titans - 56k
11. Sharks - 55k
12. Eels - 53k
13. Dragons - 49k
14. Panthers - 48k
15. Knights - 48k
16. Raiders - 45k

Ratios of twitter followers to members are:
1. Raiders - 2.77
2. Eels - 2.80
3. Dragons - 3.17
4. Souths - 3.30
5. Panthers - 3.42
6. Broncos - 3.71
7. Knights - 3.88
8. Cowboys - 4.08
9. Sharks - 4.32
10. Bulldogs - 4.49
11. Roosters - 4.67
12. Tigers - 4.77
13. Manly - 4.81
14. Storm - 5.53
15. Titans - 5.94
16. Warriors - 6.33
ALL CLUBS COMBINED - 4.11

So, what can we draw from this? Either the clubs at the top of the list (Raiders, Eels, Dragons, etc) have done a good job in converting their general followers into becoming members or they need to do a better job with their social media.

On the flipside, either the clubs at the bottom of the list (Warriors, Titans and Storm) do a great job with their social media, or they are very poor at converting these followers into members. They may also have the greatest potential to increase their memberships in the near future.
Click to expand...
 
C

chahrour123

Juniors
Messages
172
Just a question, does anyone know what is the highest number of teams that have reached 20k memberships?. Are we on track to break it?.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top