I assume clubs would have different dates etc?
My Parramatta membership (ACT - Family) had a massive jump. $180 up to $295.
Not sure why Storm's were so late, yes most clubs seemed to be much earlierYeah but I’m no genius but wouldn’t it make sense to let the auto renewals tick over as close to November as possible for cash flow and to start promoting new members? It just doesn’t makes sense. Clubs still have a way to go to streamline fan engagement.
Another update today with matching figures from last year. Just 6,700 ahead of last year which isn't promising when you consider last year's WT figure is probably greater than this year's GC figure (if they ever publish).
View attachment 16609
http://leagueunlimited.com/news/31031-2018-nrl-club-membership-tracker/
My gut feel remains with NZ that they went on sale extremely late compared to normal. Jersey launch happened yesterday maybe that will remind peopleAgree your sentiments, but the poor performance to date of the Warriors is also impacting,whereas this time last year 10,000 odd.
We have to accept the fact with fickle NRL fans, poor performing teams will have less members the following year.And conversely with higher performing teams.We are up 4% set on 2017,if the NRL continues in that vein, that still represents growth.I
I'm expecting Newcastle to come good with membership, the Storm are ripping and tearing, as are Souths.I believe the Eels will crack 25,000 easily.
Still appreciate your efforts in providing updates, it gets us all excited for season 2018,and stops us worrying about the cost of Christmas presents and entertainment.
Each to their own. There is no one good way of charting anything, this is just something i like to do and others on here may appreciate seeing as a percentage how far to reaching last years total memberships and if there is a negative or positive in growth. Growth could be achieved by some teams before the season starts while others won't reach their totals of last year or worse yet the year before. Comparing numbers against same time last year is a good indicator but not necessarily always a true indicator. You could have low memberships at the start of the year and then everyone starts jumping on the bandwagon because a team is performing better than last year, so it all depends really.Not sure you understood what I was getting at. I'm asking why bother charting growth against the final figure?
Surely it's of more value to track against same time last year?